Afrodita Zendelska; Adrijana Trajanova; Mirjana Golomeova; Blagoj Golomeov; Dejan Mirakovski; Nikolinka Doneva; Marija Hadzi-Nikolova
Abstract
The treatment of acid mine drainages is usually based on two basic technologies, active and passive treatment technologies. Whichever acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment method is employed, a neutralizing procedure that raises the water's pH over 7.0 using alkaline agents is required prior to discharge. ...
Read More
The treatment of acid mine drainages is usually based on two basic technologies, active and passive treatment technologies. Whichever acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment method is employed, a neutralizing procedure that raises the water's pH over 7.0 using alkaline agents is required prior to discharge. A comparison of eight different agents (BaCO3, Na2CO3, NaOH, KOH, K2CO3, MgO, CaCO3, and Ba(OH)2) was performed in order to choose the most effective neutralizing agent for acid mine drainage treatment. The experiments were performed using a multi-component synthetic aqueous solution with an initial concentration of 10 mg/L of the Cu, Mn, Zn, Fe, and Pb ions and an initial pH value of 1.9. According to the research, the most effective neutralizing agent for the removal of heavy metals from a multi-component aqueous solution is MgO, while the least effective agent was Na2CO3. The obtained series of effective neutralizing agents for the removal of heavy metals from a multi-component aqueous solution are presented in the work. The effect of the studied concentration of neutralizing agents depends on the neutralizing agents and heavy metals that are used. The percentage of heavy metals removed from aqueous solutions increases along with rising pH values. The consumption of the neutralizing agent decreases as the concentration of the neutralizing agent is increased. In addition, the time taken to achieve pH depends on the agent concentration. In particular, as the concentration of the neutralizing agent increases, the time to reach the pH decreases.
Exploration
V. Adjiski; D. Mirakovski; Z. Despodov; S. Mijalkovski
Abstract
Auxiliary ventilation of the blind development heading in underground mines is one of the most challenging work activities amongst mining underground operations. The auxiliary forcing ventilation system provides positive pressure, cooling, controlling gas layering, and removing diesel fumes and dust ...
Read More
Auxiliary ventilation of the blind development heading in underground mines is one of the most challenging work activities amongst mining underground operations. The auxiliary forcing ventilation system provides positive pressure, cooling, controlling gas layering, and removing diesel fumes and dust levels from development headings, stopes, and services facilities. The effectiveness of the auxiliary forcing ventilation system depends upon many system variables. Currently, no scientific models and calculations are available that can be used to estimate the optimal distance from the outlet of the auxiliary forcing ventilation system to the development heading in underground mines that can provide the most efficient ventilation close to the face of the heading. In this work, scenarios are developed and simulated with a validated CFD model inside the ANSYS Fluent software. In each scenario, the system parameters such as dead zone, mean age of air, and face velocity are calculated, which are later used in the optimization process. By examining these parameters at the development heading zone, we can quantify the effectiveness of the ventilation system and confirm that the system design meets the government regulations. This work is carried out using the k-epsilon realizable turbulent model inside the ANSYS Fluent software.
