Sh. Khosravimanesh; M. Cheraghi Seifabad; R. Mikaeil; R. Bagherpour
Abstract
In most rock drilling operations, the low rate of penetration (ROP) can be primarily attributed to the presence of the cuttings produced during drilling and the thermal stresses caused by friction at the bit-rock interface, which can be exacerbated with the increasing strength, hardness, and abrasivity ...
Read More
In most rock drilling operations, the low rate of penetration (ROP) can be primarily attributed to the presence of the cuttings produced during drilling and the thermal stresses caused by friction at the bit-rock interface, which can be exacerbated with the increasing strength, hardness, and abrasivity of the drilled rock. In order to improve ROP, drill bit lifetime, and cutting power, it is necessary to minimize the process forces due to the mechanical bit-rock interaction and the thermal stresses generated in the drill hole. Any improvement in these areas is extremely important from both the technical and the economic perspectives. This improvement can be achieved by the use of appropriate cooling/lubricating fluids in the drilling process in order to increase ROP, reduce the temperature of the drilling environment, and create a clean drill hole free of cuttings. In this work, a series of laboratory drilling tests are performed to investigate and compare ROP in the drilling of seven samples of hard and soft rock in the presence of six different cooling-lubricating fluids. The drilling tests are performed on the cubic specimens with a laboratory-scale drilling rig at several different rotation speeds and thrust forces. The statistical analyses are performed in order to investigate the relationship between ROP and the mechanical properties of the rock, properties of the fluid, and machining parameters of the drilling rig. These analyses show that under similar conditions in terms of mechanical properties of the rock using Syncool with a concentration of 1:100 and soap water with a concentration of 1:120 instead of pure water leads to the average 31% and 37% increased ROP in granite, 36% and 43% increased ROP in marble, and 47% and 61% increased ROP in travertine, respectively. These results demonstrate the good performance of these cooling/lubricating fluids in increasing ROP.
M. Ansari; M. Hosseini; A. R. Taleb Beydokhti
Abstract
Rock abrasivity, as one of the most important parameters affecting the rock drillability, significantly influences the drilling rate in mines. Therefore, rock abrasivity should be carefully evaluated prior to selecting and employing drilling machines. Since the tests for a rock abrasivity assessment ...
Read More
Rock abrasivity, as one of the most important parameters affecting the rock drillability, significantly influences the drilling rate in mines. Therefore, rock abrasivity should be carefully evaluated prior to selecting and employing drilling machines. Since the tests for a rock abrasivity assessment require sophisticated laboratory equipment, empirical models can be used to predict rock abrasivity. Several indices based on five known methods have been introduced for assessing rock abrasivity including rock abrasivity index (RAI), Cerchar abrasivity index (CAI), Schimazek’s abrasivity factor (F-abrasivity), bit wear index (BWI), and LCPC abrasivity coefficient (LAC). In this work, 12 rock types with different origins were investigated using the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian test for tensile strength, and longitudinal wave velocity and LCPC tests, and microscopic observations were made to obtain a correlation for estimating the LCPC abrasivity coefficient by conducting the conventional rock mechanics tests. Using the equivalent quartz content, velocity of longitudinal waves, and rock brittleness index, a linear correlation was obtained with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 93.3% using SPSS in order to estimate LAC.
H. R. Nejati; Seyed A. Moosavi
Abstract
Assessment of the correlation between rock brittleness and rock fracture toughness has been the subject of extensive research works in the recent years. Unfortunately, the brittleness measurement methods have not yet been standardized, and rock fracture toughness cannot be estimated satisfactorily by ...
Read More
Assessment of the correlation between rock brittleness and rock fracture toughness has been the subject of extensive research works in the recent years. Unfortunately, the brittleness measurement methods have not yet been standardized, and rock fracture toughness cannot be estimated satisfactorily by the proposed indices. In the present study, statistical analyses are performed on some data collected from the literature to develop two equations for estimation of modes I and II fracture toughness. Then a probabilistic sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the impact of the input parameters on the output ones. Based on the results obtained for the probabilistic analysis, a new empirical brittleness index including tensile strength, uniaxial compressive strength, and elastic modulus is suggested for estimating modes I and II fracture toughness. The analyses results reveal that the proposed index is capable of estimating rock fracture toughness with more satisfactory correlation compared to the previous indices.
