M. Jahani Chegeni; S. Kolahi
Abstract
The number of lifters in the liner of ball mills and the mill rotation speed are among the most significant factors affecting the behavior of grinding charge (balls) and their motion trajectory, and consequently, the comminution mechanism in these mills. In this research, in order to find a suitable ...
Read More
The number of lifters in the liner of ball mills and the mill rotation speed are among the most significant factors affecting the behavior of grinding charge (balls) and their motion trajectory, and consequently, the comminution mechanism in these mills. In this research, in order to find a suitable range for the number of lifters in the liner of ball mills, the DEM method is utilized. Initially, a pilot-scale ball mill with dimensions of 2.0 m × 1.11 m without any lifter is simulated. Afterwards, by adding, respectively, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 20, 26, 30, and 32 cuboid lifter(s) with dimensions of 2 m × 5 cm × 5 cm, nine other separate simulations are performed. The influences of the number of cuboid lifters on the two new factors introduced here, namely ‘head height’ (HH) and ‘impact zone length’ (IZL) at various mill speeds, that is, 70% and 80% of its critical speed (CS) are investigated. The results indicate that in order to find a suitable range for the number of lifters in the liner of ball mills, it is necessary to consider these two parameters simultaneously as the criteria for selecting the appropriate range, That is, liners that simultaneously produce both a higher HH and a greater IZL are more suitable for use in the industry. The results also demonstrate that the suitable range for the number of cuboid lifters in the liner of ball mills is between 16 and 32, which field research on the ball mills of three different plants in the industry confirms the accuracy of the results obtained in this research. Unlike the previous research works, it has now been shown that the number of ball mill lifters does not only depend on the diameter of the mill but also depends on the width, height, angle of the lifter, and generally on the type of lifter.
Mineral Processing
S. Kolahi; M. Jahani Chegeni
Abstract
The number of lifters of mill shell liners, mill rotation speed, and filling percentage of grinding media are three of the most important parameters influencing the charge behavior and the trajectory of ball motion inside the SAG mills, and consequently, their performance. In this paper, the milling ...
Read More
The number of lifters of mill shell liners, mill rotation speed, and filling percentage of grinding media are three of the most important parameters influencing the charge behavior and the trajectory of ball motion inside the SAG mills, and consequently, their performance. In this paper, the milling operation of pilot-scale SAG mills using the discrete element method (DEM) is investigated. First, a pilot-scale SAG mill with dimensions of 3.0 m × 1.5 m with no lifter is simulated. Then by adding, respectively, one, two, four, eight, sixteen, and thirty-two rectangle lifter(s), six other independent simulations are performed. The effects of the number of lifters on the two new parameters introduced by the authors, i.e. ‘head height’ and ‘impact zone length’ as well as on creation of cascading, cataracting, and centrifuging motions for balls at two different mill speeds, i.e. 70% and 80% of its critical speed (NC), are evaluated. Also in order to validate the simulation results, a laboratory-scale SAG mill is simulated. The results obtained indicate that the optimum number of lifters for pilot-scale SAG mills is between 16 and 32 lifters with medium thickness. Liners with the number of lifters in this range require less mill speed to create cataract motions. However, liners with the number of lifters less than this range require a higher mill speed. Also liners with the number of lifters beyond this range require less mill speed, and can cause centrifugal motions in the balls. Comparison of the simulations related to the laboratory-scale SAG mill with experimental results demonstrates a good agreement, which validates the DEM simulations and the software used.
