<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Shahrood University of Technology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Mining and Environment</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-8592</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A comprehensive benchmark between two filter-based multiple-point simulation algorithms</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>139</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>149</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1292</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22044/jme.2018.7335.1584</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bavand Savadkoohi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Faculty of Mining, Petroleum &amp; Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>B.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tokhmechi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Faculty of Mining, Petroleum &amp; Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>E.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Gloaguen</LastName>
<Affiliation>Centre Eau Terre Environnement, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Québec, Canada</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A.R.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Arab-Amiri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Faculty of Mining, Petroleum &amp; Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>07</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Computer graphics offer various gadgets to enhance the reconstruction of high-order statistics that are not correctly addressed by the two-point statistics approaches. Almost all the newly developed multiple-point geostatistics (MPS) algorithms, to some extent, adapt these techniques to increase the simulation accuracy and efficiency. In this work, a scrutiny comparison between our recently developed MPS algorithm, the cross-correlation-wavelet simulation (CCWSIM), and a well-known MPS algorithm, FILTERSIM, is performed. The main motivation to benchmark these two algorithms is that both exploit some digital image processing filters for feature extraction. Indeed, both algorithms compute the similarity (or dissimilarity) between data events in simulation grid and training image in the feature space. In order to compare the accuracy of the algorithms, some statistics such as facies proportion, variogram, and connectivity function are computed. The results obtained reveal an excellent agreement of the CCWSIM realizations with the training image rather than FILTERSIM. Furthermore, on average, the required simulation runtime for CCWSIM is at least 10 times less than that for FILTERSIM.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Multiple-Point Simulation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Filter-Based Algorithms</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Geostatistical Simulation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">FILTERSIM Algorithm</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">CCWSIM Algorithm</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jme.shahroodut.ac.ir/article_1292_929a719394bd8a5d70aa48842308c94b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
