Document Type : Original Research Paper


1 Faculty of Mining, Petroleum & Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.

2 Research and Development Division, Sarcheshmeh Copper Mine, National Iranian Copper Industries Company, Rafsanjan, Iran.


Generally, mineral processing plants generate a large quantity of waste in the form of fine particles. The flotation speed of mineral microbubbles by coarse bubbles is dramatically higher than that of individual particles. The advantage of microbubbles is due to the increase of binding efficiency of conventional bubbles with fine particles coated with microbubbles. Here, the focus is on reducing chemicals consumption and improving recovery. After preparing a representative sample, XRF, XRD, and mineralogical analyses were performed. Then 50 experiments were selected by experimental design using the response surface method (RSM), and in the form of central Composite design (CCD) by (design expert) DX 13 software. The interactions of collector consumption, frother agent, pH, particle size, and solid percentage were investigated, and 25 experiments using typical flotation and without nano-microbubbles and others with nano-microbubbles were conducted. The laboratory standard limit of the collector used in the pilot plant of the Sarcheshmeh Copper copper complex is 40 g/t (25 g/t of C7240 plus 15 g/t of Z11). Here, by consuming 20 g/t of collector in the absence of nanomicrobubbles, a recovery of 79.96% and in the presence of nanomicrobubbles, a recovery of 80.07% was obtained, that is a 50% reduction in collector consumption and a 0.11% increase in recovery was observed. Also the laboratory standard limit of frother used in the pilot plant of Sarcheshemeh Copper Complex is 30 g/t (15 g/t of MIBC plus 15 g/t of A65). Here, by using 10 g/t of frother in the absence of nanomicrobubbles, a recovery of 78.12%, and in the presence of nanomicrobubbles, a recovery of 82.05% was obtained. In other words, a decrease of 66.6% in the consumption of frother and an increase of 1.93% in recovery was observed.


Main Subjects

[1]. Trahar, W. J. (1981). A rational interpretation of the role of particle size in flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing8(4), 289-327.
[2]. Ahmed, N. and Jameson, G. J. (1985). The effect of bubble size on the rate of flotation of fine particles. International journal of mineral processing14(3), 195-215.
[3]. Yoon, R. H. and Luttrell, G. H. (1986). The effect of bubble size on fine coal flotation. Coal Preparation2(3), 179-192.
[4]. Ding, S., Xing, Y., Zheng, X., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., and Gui, X. (2020). New insights into the role of surface nanobubbles in bubble-particle detachment. Langmuir36(16), 4339-4346.
[5]. Lei, W., Zhang, M., Zhang, Z., Zhan, N., and Fan, R. (2020). Effect of bulk nanobubbles on the entrainment of kaolinite particles in flotation. Powder Technology362, 84-89.
[6]. Liu, L., Hu, S., Wu, C., Liu, K., Weng, L., and Zhou, W. (2021). Aggregates characterizations of the ultra-fine coal particles induced by nanobubbles. Fuel297, 120765.
[7]. Tao, D., Wu, Z., and Sobhy, A. (2021). Investigation of nanobubble enhanced reverse anionic flotation of hematite and associated mechanisms. Powder Technology379, 12-25.
[8]. Zhou, W., Chen, H., Ou, L., and Shi, Q. (2016). Aggregation of ultra-fine scheelite particles induced by hydrodynamic cavitation. International Journal of Mineral Processing157, 236-240.
[9]. Zhou, W., Niu, J., Xiao, W., and Ou, L. (2019). Adsorption of bulk nanobubbles on the chemically surface-modified muscovite minerals. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry51, 31-39.
[10]. Matis, K. A., Gallios, G. P., and Kydros, K. A. (1993). Separation of fines by flotation techniques. Separations Technology3(2), 76-90.
[11]. Ansari, M. I. (1997). Fine particle processing-A difficult problem for mineral engineers.
[12]. Yalcin, T. and Byers, A. (2006). Dissolved gas flotation in mineral processing. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review27(2), 87-97.
[13]. Maoming, F. A. N., Daniel, T. A. O., Honaker, R., and Zhenfu, L. U. O. (2010). Nanobubble generation and its applications in froth flotation (part III): specially designed laboratory scale column flotation of phosphate. Mining Science and Technology (China)20(3), 317-338.
[14]. Maoming, F. A. N., Daniel, T. A. O., HONAKER, R., and Zhenfu, L. U. O. (2010). Nanobubble generation and its applications in froth flotation (part IV): mechanical cells and specially designed column flotation of coal. Mining Science and Technology (China)20(5), 641-671.
[15]. Jameson, G. J. (2010). Advances in fine and coarse particle flotation. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly49(4), 325-330.
[16]. Ushikubo, F. Y., Furukawa, T., Nakagawa, R., Enari, M., Makino, Y., Kawagoe, Y., ... and Oshita, S. (2010). Evidence of the existence and the stability of nano-bubbles in water. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects361(1-3), 31-37.
[17]. Miettinen, T., Ralston, J., and Fornasiero, D. (2010). The limits of fine particle flotation. Minerals engineering23(5), 420-437.
[18]. Albijanic, B., Amini, E., Wightman, E., Ozdemir, O., Nguyen, A. V., and Bradshaw, D. J. (2011). A relationship between the bubble–particle attachment time and the mineralogy of a copper–sulphide ore. Minerals Engineering24(12), 1335-1339.
[19]. Albijanic, B., Bradshaw, D. J., and Nguyen, A. V. (2012). The relationships between the bubble–particle attachment time, collector dosage and the mineralogy of a copper sulfide ore. Minerals Engineering36, 309-313.
[20]. Calgaroto, S., Wilberg, K. Q., and Rubio, J. (2014). On the nanobubbles interfacial properties and future applications in flotation. Minerals Engineering60, 33-40.
[21]. Mazahernasab, R. and Ahmadi, R. (2016). Determination of bubble size distribution in a laboratory mechanical flotation cell by a laser diffraction technique. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing52.
[22]. Leistner, T., Peuker, U. A., and Rudolph, M. (2017). How gangue particle size can affect the recovery of ultrafine and fine particles during froth flotation. Minerals Engineering109, 1-9.
[23]. Rulyov, N., Nessipbay, Т., Dulatbek, T., Larissa, S., & and Zhamikhan, K. (2018). Effect of microbubbles as flotation carriers on fine sulphide ore beneficiation. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy127(3), 133-139.
[24]. Nazari, S., Shafaei, S. Z., Gharabaghi, M., Ahmadi, R., Shahbazi, B., and Maoming, F. (2019). Effects of nanobubble and hydrodynamic parameters on coarse quartz flotation. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology29(2), 289-295.
[25]. de Medeiros, A. R. S. and Baltar, C. A. M. (2018). Importance of collector chain length in flotation of fine particles. Minerals Engineering122, 179-184.
[26]. Tao, D. and Sobhy, A. (2019). Nanobubble effects on hydrodynamic interactions between particles and bubbles. Powder technology346, 385-395.
[27]. Ebrahimi, H., Karamoozian, M., and Saghravani, S. F. (2022). Interaction of applying stable micro-nano bubbles and ultrasonic irradiation in coal flotation. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization42(5), 1548-1562.
[28]. Farrokhpay, S., Filippova, I., Filippov, L., Picarra, A., Rulyov, N., and Fornasiero, D. (2020). Flotation of fine particles in the presence of combined microbubbles and conventional bubbles. Minerals Engineering155, 106439.
[29]. Farrokhpay, S., Filippov, L., and Fornasiero, D. (2021). Flotation of fine particles: A review. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review42(7), 473-483.
[30]. Li, C., Xu, M., Xing, Y., Zhang, H., and Peuker, U. A. (2020). Efficient separation of fine coal assisted by surface nanobubbles. Separation and Purification Technology249, 117163.
[31]. Chang, G., Xing, Y., Zhang, F., Yang, Z., Liu, X., and Gui, X. (2020). Effect of nanobubbles on the flotation performance of oxidized coal. ACS omega5(32), 20283-20290.
[32]. Nazari, S. and Hassanzadeh, A. (2020). The effect of reagent type on generating bulk sub-micron (nano) bubbles and flotation kinetics of coarse-sized quartz particles. Powder Technology374, 160-171.
[33]. Sobhy, A., Wu, Z., and Tao, D. (2021). Statistical analysis and optimization of reverse anionic hematite flotation integrated with nanobubbles. Minerals Engineering163, 106799.
[34]. Zhang, Z., Ren, L., and Zhang, Y. (2021). Role of nanobubbles in the flotation of fine rutile particles. Minerals Engineering172, 107140.
[35]. Li, C. and Zhang, H. (2022). A review of bulk nanobubbles and their roles in flotation of fine particles. Powder Technology395, 618-633.
[36]. Li, C. and Zhang, H. (2022). Surface nanobubbles and their roles in flotation of fine particles–A review. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry106, 37-51.
[37]. Schubert, H. (2005). Nanobubbles, hydrophobic effect, heterocoagulation and hydrodynamics in flotation. International Journal of Mineral Processing78(1), 11-21.
[38]. Hampton, M. A. and Nguyen, A. V. (2009). Systematically altering the hydrophobic nanobubble bridging capillary force from attractive to repulsive. Journal of colloid and interface science333(2), 800-806.
[39]. Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York1997, 200-1.
[40]. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., and Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley & Sons.
[41]. Hinkelman, K., Kempthorne, O., and Kshivsagar, A. M. (1996). Design and analysis of experiments. Volume I: Introduction to experimental design. Statistical Methods in Medical Research5(1), 101-101.
[42]. Kincl, M., Turk, S., and Vrečer, F. (2005). Application of experimental design methodology in development and optimization of drug release method. International journal of pharmaceutics291(1-2), 39-49.
[43]. Simate, G. S., Ndlovu, S., and Gericke, M. (2009). Bacterial leaching of nickel laterites using chemolithotrophic microorganisms: process optimisation using response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design. Hydrometallurgy98(3-4), 241-246.
[44]. Niaki, R., Abazarpoor, A., Halali, M., Maarefvand, M., and Ebrahimi, G. (2015). Application of response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design for modeling and optimization of sulfuric and nitric leaching of spent catalyst. Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals56, 155-164.
[45]. Behera, S. K., Meena, H., Chakraborty, S., and Meikap, B. C. (2018). Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of leaching parameters for ash reduction from low-grade coal. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology28(4), 621-629.
[46]. Sahu, J. N., Acharya, J., and Meikap, B. C. (2009). Response surface modeling and optimization of chromium (VI) removal from aqueous solution using Tamarind wood activated carbon in batch process. Journal of hazardous materials172(2-3), 818-825.
[47]. Vazifeh, Y., Jorjani, E., and Bagherian, A. (2010). Optimization of reagent dosages for copper flotation using statistical technique. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China20(12), 2371-2378.
[48]. Rao, G. V. and Mohanty, S. (2002). Optimization of flotation parameters for enhancement of grade and recovery of phosphate from low-grade dolomitic rock phosphate ore from Jhamarkotra, India. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration19, 154-160.
[49]. Aslan, N. E. V. Z. A. T. and Fidan, R. (2008). Optimization of Pb flotation using statistical technique and quadratic programming. Separation and Purification Technology62(1), 160-165.
[50]. Mehrabani, J. V., Noaparast, M., Mousavi, S. M., Dehghan, R., and Ghorbani, A. (2010). Process optimization and modelling of sphalerite flotation from a low-grade Zn-Pb ore using response surface methodology. Separation and Purification Technology72(3), 242-249.
[51]. Kwak, J. S. (2005). Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for geometric error in surface grinding process. International journal of machine tools and manufacture45(3), 327-334.
[52]. Awe, S. A., Khoshkhoo, M., Kruger, P., and SANDSTROeM, A. (2012). Modelling and process optimisation of antimony removal from a complex copper concentrate. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China22(3), 675-685.
[53]. Bezerra, M. A., Santelli, R. E., Oliveira, E. P., Villar, L. S., and Escaleira, L. A. (2008). Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta76(5), 965-977.
[54]. Rakić, T., Kasagić-Vujanović, I., Jovanović, M., Jančić-Stojanović, B., and Ivanović, D. (2014). Comparison of full factorial design, central composite design, and box-behnken design in chromatographic method development for the determination of fluconazole and its impurities. Analytical Letters47(8), 1334-1347.
[55]. Box, G. E. and Hunter, J. S. (1957). Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 195-241.
[56]. Kafshgari, L. A., Ghorbani, M., Azizi, A., Agarwal, S., and Gupta, V. K. (2017). Modeling and optimization of Direct Red 16 adsorption from aqueous solutions using nanocomposite of MnFe2O4/MWCNTs: RSM-CCRD model. Journal of molecular liquids233, 370-377.
[57]. Arefi, A. (2015). Application of micro/nanobubbles and nanomaterials in improving the mechanical behavior and insulation of building materials (with emphasis on concrete). Master of Science Thesis in Civil Engineering (Water and Environment), Faculty of Civil Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
[58]. Tao, Y., Liu, J., Yu, S., and Tao, D. (2006). Picobubble enhanced fine coal flotation. Separation Science and Technology41(16), 3597-3607.
[59]. Zhang, X. Y., Wang, Q. S., Wu, Z. X., and Tao, D. P. (2020). An experimental study on size distribution and zeta potential of bulk cavitation nanobubbles. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials27, 152-161.