Document Type : Original Research Paper
Authors
Faculty of Mining, Petroleum & Geophysics Eng., Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
Abstract
Consumed energy is the most important issue and concern in industrial ball mills, and includes a major part of the costs of mineral processing plants. By using suitable liners and the optimal lifter count, the energy of the mill is properly transferred to the balls. In Part 1 of this research work, five types of liners, i.e. Lorain, Osborn, Rib, cuboid, and Hi-lo, are examined. These liners all have separate lifters with the same volume. Their difference is in the width, height, and type of lifter profile. First, all types of liners are simulated with four lifters using the Discrete Element Method (DEM). Then the lifter count is increased four by four to fill the entire wall of the mill with lifters. Based on this, Lorain liner from 4 to 24 lifters, Osborn liner from 4 to 120 lifters, Rib liner from 4 to 40 lifters, and cuboid and Hi-lo liners from 4 to 64 lifters are simulated. For the first time, the kinetic (KE) and potential (PE) energies as well as the sum of these two energies (TE) of all the balls are calculated, and compared in the entire duration of the simulation from 0–13s for all the liner types and lifter counts mentioned above. Finally, by using data related to KE, PE, and TE for each type of liner, the optimal lifter count is obtained. Accordingly, 16 to 20 lifters are recommended for the Lorain liner, 64 to 76 lifters for the Osborn liner, 24 to 32 lifters for the Rib liner, 44 lifters for the cuboid liner, and 36 to 44 lifters for the Hi-lo liner.
Keywords
- Discrete Element Method
- Industrial ball mills
- Liner type, Lifter count
- Kinetic and potential energies
Main Subjects
[1]. Makokha, A.B., Moys, M.H., Bwalya, M.M., & Kimera, K. (2007). A new approach to optimising the life and performance of worn liners in ball mills: Experimental study and DEM simulation. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 84, 221–227.
[2]. Lee, H., Kim, K., & Lee, H. (2019). Analysis of grinding kinetics in a laboratory ball mill using population-balance-model and discrete-element-method. Advanced Powder Technology, 30, 2517–2526.
[3]. Rosales-Marín, G., Andrade, J., Alvarado, G., Delgadillo, G.A., & Tuzcu, E.T. (2019). Study of lifter wear and breakage rates for different lifter geometries in tumbling mill: Experimental and simulation analysis using population balance model. Minerals Engineering, 141, 105857.
[4]. Yahyaei, M., Powel, M.S., Toor, P., Tuxford, A., & Limpus, A. (2015). Relining efficiency and liner design for improved plant performance. Minerals Engineering, 83, 64–77.
[5]. Yin, Z., Peng, Y., Zhu, Z., Yu, Z., & Li, T. (2017). Impact load behavior between different charge and lifter in a laboratory-scale mill. Materials, 10(8), 882.
[6]. Mishra, B.K., & Rajamani, R.K. (1992). The discrete element method for the simulation of ball mills. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 16(11), 598–604.
[7]. Mishra, B.K., & Rajamani, R.K. (1993). Numerical simulation of charge motion in ball mills—Lifter bar effect. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 10, 86–90.
[8]. Mishra, B.K., & Rajamani, R.K. (1994a). Simulation of charge motion in ball mills. Part 1: experimental verifications. International Journal of Mineral Processing 1994a, 40, 171–186.
[9]. Mishra, B.K., & Rajamani, R.K. (1994b). Simulation of charge motion in ball mills. Part 2: numerical simulations. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 40, 187–197.
[10]. Agrawala, S., Rajamani, R.K., Songfack, P., & Mishra, B.K. (1997). Mechanics of media motion in tumbling mills with 3d discrete element method. Minerals Engineering, 10(2), 215–227.
[11]. Radziszewski, P. (1999). Comparing three DEM charge motion models. Minerals Engineering, 12(12), 1501–1520.
[12]. Cleary, P.W. (1998). Predicting charge motion, power draw, segregation and wear in ball mills using discrete element methods. Minerals Engineering, 11, 1061–1080.
[13]. Cleary, P.W. (2001a). Charge behaviour and power consumption in ball mills: sensitivity to mill operating conditions, liner geometry and charge composition. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 63, 79–114.
[14]. Cleary, P.W. (2001b). Modelling comminution devices using DEM. International Journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, 25, 83–105.
[15]. Monama, G.M., & Moys, M.H. (2002). DEM modelling of the dynamics of mill startup. Minerals Engineering, 15, 487–492.
[16]. Hlungwani, O., Rikhotso, J., Dong, H., & Moys, M.H. (2003). Further validation of DEM modeling of milling: effects of liner profile and mill speed. Minerals Engineering, 16, 993–998.
[17]. Djordjevic, N. (2003a). Discrete element modelling of the influence of lifters on power draw of tumbling mills. Minerals Engineering, 16, 331–336.
[18]. Djordjevic, N. (2003b). Discrete element modelling of power draw of tumbling mills. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 112(2), 109–114.
[19]. Djordjevic, N. (2003c). Discrete element modelling of lifter stresses in tumbling mill. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 112(2), 115–119.
[20]. Mishra, B.K. (2003a). A review of computer simulation of tumbling mills by the discrete element method: Part I— contact mechanics. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 71, 73– 93.
[21]. Mishra, B.K. (2003b). A review of computer simulation of tumbling mills by the discrete element method: Part II—Practical applications. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 71, 95–112.
[22]. Powell, M.S., & McBride, A.T. (2004). A three-dimensional analysis of media motion and grinding regions in mills. Minerals Engineering, 17, 1099–1109.
[23]. Makokha, A.B., & Moys, M.H. (2006). Towards optimising ball-milling capacity: Effect of lifter design. Minerals Engineering, 19, 1439–1445.
[24]. Rezaeizadeh, M., Fooladi, M., Powell, M.S., & Mansouri, S.H. (2010). Experimental observations of lifter parameters and mill operation on power draw and liner impact loading. Minerals Engineering, 23, 1182–1191.
[25]. Pérez-Alonso, C., & Delgadillo, J.A. (2012). Experimental validation of 2D DEM code by digital image analysis in tumbling mills. Minerals Engineering, 25, 20–27.
[26]. Rajamani, R.K., Rashidi, S., & Dhawan, N. (2014). Advances in discrete element method application to grinding mills. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 100, 117–128.
[27]. Bbosa, L.S., Govender, I., & Mainza, A. (2016). Development of a novel methodology to determine mill power draw. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 149, 94–103.
[28]. Boemer, D., & Ponthot, J.P. (2017). DEM modeling of ball mills with experimental validation: influence of contact parameters on charge motion and power draw. Computational Particle Mechanics, 4, 53–67.
[29]. Peng, Y., Li, T., Zhu, Z., Zou, S., & Yin, Z. (2017). Discrete element method simulations of load behavior with mono-sized iron ore particles in a ball mill. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(5), 1687814017705597.
[30]. Bian, X., Wang, G., Wang, H., Wang, S., & Lv, W. (2017). Effect of lifters and mill speed on particle behaviour, torque, and power consumption of a tumbling ball mill: Experimental study and DEM simulation. Minerals Engineering, 105, 22–35.
[31]. Sun, Y., Liang, M., Jin, X., Ji, P., & Shan, J. (2017). Experimental and modeling study of the regular polygon angle-spiral liner in ball mills. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 30(2), 363–372.
[32]. Pedrayes, F., Norniella, J.G., Melero, M.G., Menéndez-Aguado, J.M., Juan, J.J., & del Coz-Díaz, J. (2018). Frequency domain characterization of torque in tumbling ball mills using DEM modelling: Application to filling level monitoring. Powder Technology, 323, 433–444.
[33]. Li, Z., Wang, Y., Li, K., Lin, W., & Tong, X. (2018). Study on the performance of ball mill with liner structure based on DEM. Journal of Engineering & Technological Sciences, 50(2).
[34]. Panjipour, R., & Barani, K. The effect of ball size distribution on power draw, charge motion and breakage mechanism of tumbling ball mill by discrete element method (DEM) simulation. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing, 54(2), 258-269.
[35]. Li, G., Roufail, R., Klein, B., Zhou, L., Kumar, A., Sun, C., Kou, J., & Yu, L. (2019). Investigations on the charge motion and breakage effect of the magnetic liner mill using DEM. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 36, 1053–1065.
[36]. Chimwani, N., & Bwalya, M.M. (2020). Using DEM to investigate how shell liner can induce ball segregation in a ball mill. Minerals Engineering, 151, 106311.
[37]. Góralczyk, M., Krot, P., Zimroz, R., & Ogonowski, S. (2020). Increasing energy efficiency and productivity of the comminution process in tumbling mills by indirect measurements of internal dynamics—an overview. Energies, 13, 6735.
[38]. Shahbazi, B., Jafari, M., Parian, M., Rosenkranz, J., & Chehreh Chelgani, S. (2020). Study on the impacts of media shapes on the performance of tumbling mills – A review. Minerals Engineering, 157, 106490.
[39]. AmanNejad, M., & Barani, K. (2021). Effects of Ball Size Distribution and Mill Speed and Their Interactions on Ball Milling Using DEM. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 42(6), 374–379.
[40]. Kolahi, S., Jahani Chegeni, M., & Seifpanahi-Shabani, K. (2021). Investigation of the effect of industrial ball mill liner type on their comminution mechanism using DEM. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering, 55(2), 97–107.
[41] Jahani Chegeni, M., & Kolahi, S. (2021). Determining an Appropriate range for the Number of Cuboid Lifters in Ball Mills using DEM. Journal of Mining and Environment, 12(3), 845–862.
[42]. Safa, A., & Sahraoui, A. (2023). Exploring the effects of a new lifter design and ball mill speed on grinding performance and particle behaviour: A comparative analysis. Engineering and Technology Journal, 41(07).
)