Document Type : Original Research Paper
Authors
- Marco Antonio Cotrina Teatino 1
- Jairo Jhonatan Marquina-Araujo 1
- Jose Nestor Mamani-Quispe 2
- Solio Marino Arango-Retamozo 1
- Joe Alexis Gonzalez-Vasquez 3
- Kevin Daniel Rondo-Jalca 1
1 Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Trujillo
2 Faculty of Chemical Engineering, National University of the Altiplano of Puno
3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Trujillo
10.22044/jme.2025.16320.3174
Abstract
The classification of mineral resources significantly impacts mine planning, economic feasibility, and regulatory compliance. Despite its importance, such classification frequently depends on the subjective judgment of the Qualified Person (QP), owing to the absence of internationally standardized technical criteria for delineating resource categories. To mitigate this limitation, an innovative methodology integrating clustering based on Riemannian geometry with machine learning techniques was developed for mineral resource classification. A database of 5,654 composited samples from 185 diamond drill holes in a copper deposit in central Peru was utilized to classify 318,443 blocks. Copper grades were estimated through Ordinary Kriging (RMSE = 0.102; MAE = 0.069), generating geostatistical variables kriging variance, average distance to samples, and number of samples that served as input features for the classification. Clustering was performed using both classical KMeans and Riemannian KMeans, followed by spatial smoothing via XGBoost and Random Forest algorithms. Absolute coordinates were incorporated to address spatial discontinuities in classification outputs. The combination of the Riemannian model with Random Forest produced the highest classification performance, with a Silhouette index of 0.26 and a Davies-Bouldin index of 0.72. The resulting metal content was estimated at 4.24 Mt of copper at 0.44% grade (measured), 6.49 Mt at 0.34% Cu (indicated), and 7.68 Mt at 0.32% Cu (inferred), demonstrating close alignment with QP estimates while exhibiting improved spatial coherence. In summary, the Riemannian-based approach outperformed classical KMeans and conventional classification methods, providing a more robust, objective, and globally consistent alternative.
Keywords
Main Subjects
[1]. CIM. (2019). Estimation of mineral resources & mineral reserves best practice guidelines. Canadian Institute of Mining, 1-29.
[2]. CRIRSCO. (2024). International reporting template for the public reporting of exploration targets, exploration results, mineral resources and mineral reserves. International Council on Mining and Metals, 1-78.
[3]. JORC. (2012). Australasian code for reporting of mineral resources and ore reserves (the JORC Code). The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia, 1-44.
[4]. CIM. (2014). CIM definition standards for mineral resources & mineral reserves. CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions, 1-9.
[5]. SAMREC. (2016). The South African code for the reporting of exploration results, mineral resources and mineral reserves (the SAMREC Code). The South African Mineral Resource Committee (SAMREC), under the auspices of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1-96.
[6]. PERC. (2021). Pan-European standard for the public reporting of exploration results, mineral resources and mineral reserves. Pan-European Reserves and Resources Reporting Committee, 1-106.
[7]. SME. (2017). SME guide for reporting exploration information, mineral resources, and mineral reserves. Resources and Reserves Committee of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, 1-97.
[8]. CH20235. (2015). Código para informar sobre los resultados de exploración, recursos minerales y reservas minerales. Comisión Calificadora de Competencias en Recursos y Reservas Mineras (Chile), 1-81.
[9]. Li, J., Yang, Q., Liu, Y., & Ma, Y. (2021). Mapping between “Classifications for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (GB/T 17766-2020)” and “United Nations Framework Classification for Resources (UNFC-2019)”. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 3405-3416.
[10]. Zuo, M., & Wang, T. (2021). Research on reserve classification of solid mineral resources in China and western countries. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 631(1), 012044.
[11]. Battalgazy, N., & Madani, N. (2019). Categorization of mineral resources based on different geostatistical simulation algorithms: A case study from an iron ore deposit. Natural Resources Research, 28, 1329-1351.
[12]. Stephenson, P. (2011). Mineral resource classification: How the viability of your project may hang on a qualified person’s judgement. Canadian Institute of Mining, 1-12.
[13]. Abzalov, M. (2016). Methodology of the mineral resource classification. Modern Approaches in Solid Earth Sciences, 12, 355-363.
[14]. Cevik, I., Leuangthong, O., Caté, A., & Ortiz, J. (2021). On the use of machine learning for mineral resource classification. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 38, 2055-2073.
[15]. Menin, R., Diedrich, C., Reuwsaat, J., & De Paula, W. (2017). Drilling grid analysis for defining open-pit and underground mineral resource classification through production data. In: Gómez-Hernández, J., Rodrigo-Illari, J., Rodrigo-Clavero, M., Cassiraga, E., & Vargas-Guzmán, J. (Eds.). Geostatistics Valencia 2016, 19, 243-254.
[16]. Owusu, S., & Dagdelen, K. (2019). Critical review of mineral resource classification techniques in the gold mining industry. Insights in Mining Science & Technology, 1(3), 555564.
[17]. McManus, S., Rahman, A., Coombes, J., & Horta, A. (2021). Uncertainty assessment of spatial domain models in early stage mining projects – A review. Ore Geology Reviews, 133, 104098.
[18]. de Souza, L., Costa, J., & Koppe, J. (2009). A geostatistical contribution to assess the risk embedded in resource classification methods. In: Iron Ore 2009 Proceedings. Perth, WA, 1-12.
[19]. Dohm, C. (2005). Quantifiable mineral resource classification: A logical approach. In: Leuangthong, O., & Deutsch, C. V. (Eds.). Geostatistics Banff 2004, 14, 375-386.
[20]. Sinclair, A., & Blackwell, G. (2000). Resource/reserve classification and the qualified person. CIM Bulletin, 93(1038), 29-35.
[21]. Silva, D., & Boisvert, J. (2014). Mineral resource classification: A comparison of new and existing techniques. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 114(3), 265-273.
[22]. Rocha, V., & Bassani, M. (2023). Practical application of a multi-layer scorecard workflow (MLSW) for comprehensive mineral resource classification. Applied Earth Science: Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 132(3-4), 215-230.
[23]. Stephenson, P., Allman, A., Carville, D., Stoker, P., Mokos, P., Tyrrell, J., & Burrows, T. (2006). Mineral resource classification – It’s time to shoot the ‘spotted dog’! Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Publication Series, 1-12.
[24]. Isatelle, F., & Rivoirard, J. (2019). Mineral resources classification of a nickel laterite deposit: Comparison between conditional simulations and specific areas. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 119(6), 1-9.
[25]. Lepikhina, O., & Pravdina, E. (2016). Comparative analysis of the reserves and estimated resources classification of solid minerals of state committee of reserves and the JORC Code. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(20), 40950-40955.
[26]. Hernández, H. (2024). A semiautomatic multi-criteria method for mineral resources classification. Applied Earth Science: Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, 133(2), 211-223.
[27]. Cotrina, M., Marquina, J., & Mamani, J. (2025). Application of artificial neural networks for the categorization of mineral resources in a copper deposit in Peru. World Journal of Engineering.
[28]. Cotrina, M., Marquina, J., Mamani, J., Arango, S., Ccatamayo, J., Gonzalez, J., Donaires, T., & Calla, M. (2025). Categorization of mineral resources using Random Forest model in a copper deposit in Peru. Journal of Mining and Environment, 16(4), 947-962.
[29]. Afzal, P., Gholami, H., Madani, N., Yasrebi, A., & Sadeghi, B. (2023). Mineral resource classification using geostatistical and fractal simulation in the Masjed Daghi Cu–Mo porphyry deposit, NW Iran. Minerals, 13(3), 370.
[30]. Madani, N. (2020). Mineral resource classification based on uncertainty measures in geological domains. In: Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 157-164.
[31]. Mery, N., Maleki, M., País, G., Molina, A., Cáceres, A., & Emery, X. (2025). Fuzzy classification of mineral resources: Moving toward overlapping categories to account for geological, economic, metallurgical, environmental, and operational criteria. Natural Resources Research, 34, 1271-1299.
[32]. Marquina-Araujo, J., Cotrina-Teatino, M., Cruz-Galvez, J., Noriega-Vidal, E., & Vega-Gonzalez, J. (2024). Application of autoencoders neural network and K-means clustering for the definition of geostatistical estimation domains. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 11(5), 1207-1218.
[33]. Sadeghi, M., Casey, P., Carranza, E., & Lynch, E. (2024). Principal components analysis and K-means clustering of till geochemical data: Mapping and targeting of prospective areas for lithium exploration in Västernorrland Region, Sweden. Ore Geology Reviews, 167, 106002.
[34]. Supajaidee, N., Chutsagulprom, N., & Moonchai, S. (2024). An adaptive moving window kriging based on K-means clustering for spatial interpolation. Algorithms, 17(2), 57.
[35]. Pennec, X., Fillard, P., & Ayache, N. (2006). A Riemannian framework for tensor computing. International Journal of Computer Vision, 66(1), 41-66.
[36]. Zhuo, F., Zhang, X., Tang, F., Yu, Y., & Liu, L. (2024). Riemannian transfer learning based on log-Euclidean metric for EEG classification. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, 1381572.
[37]. Miah, A., Rahim, M., & Shin, J. (2020). Motor-imagery classification using Riemannian geometry with median absolute deviation. Electronics (Switzerland), 9(10), 1584.
[38]. Riquelme, Á., & Ortiz, J. (2024). A Riemannian tool for clustering of geo-spatial multivariate data. Mathematical Geosciences, 56, 121-141.
[39]. Bianchi, M., & Zheng, C. (2009). SGeMS: A free and versatile tool for three-dimensional geostatistical applications. Ground Water, 47(1), 8-12.
[40]. Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., & Yu, G. (2017). Applied geostatistics analysis for reservoir characterization based on the SGeMS (Stanford Geostatistical Modeling Software). Open Journal of Yangtze Oil and Gas, 2(1), 45-66.
[41]. Daya, A. (2015). Ordinary kriging for the estimation of vein type copper deposit: A case study of the Chelkureh, Iran. Journal of Mining and Metallurgy A: Mining, 51(1), 1-14.
[42]. Shi, N., Liu, X., & Guan, Y. (2010). Research on K-means clustering algorithm: An improved K-means clustering algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology and Security Informatics (IITSI 2010), China, 1-5.
[43]. Vattani, A. (2011). K-means requires exponentially many iterations even in the plane. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 45(3), 596-616.
[44]. Barachant, A., Bonnet, S., Congedo, M., & Jutten, C. (2013). Classification of covariance matrices using a Riemannian-based kernel for BCI applications. Neurocomputing, 112, 172-178.
[45]. Goh, A., & Vidal, R. (2008). Clustering and dimensionality reduction on Riemannian manifolds. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2008), USA, 1-8.
[46]. Kalunga, E., Chevallier, S., Barthélemy, Q., Djouani, K., Monacelli, E., & Hamam, Y. (2016). Online SSVEP-based BCI using Riemannian geometry. Neurocomputing, 191, 55-68.
[47]. You, K., & Park, H. J. (2021). Re-visiting Riemannian geometry of symmetric positive definite matrices for the analysis of functional connectivity. NeuroImage, 225, 117464.
[48]. Rodrigues, P., Jutten, C., & Congedo, M. (2019). Riemannian Procrustes analysis: Transfer learning for brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 66(8), 2390-2401.
[49]. Cotrina, M., Marquina, J., Mamani, J., Arango, S., Gonzalez, J., Ccatamayo, J., & Noriega, E. (2024). Predictive model using machine learning to determine fuel consumption in CAT-777F mining equipment. International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering, 15(2), 147-160.
[50]. Lei, T., Ng, S., & Siu, S. (2023). Application of ANN, XGBoost, and other ML methods to forecast air quality in Macau. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(6), 5341.
[51]. Li, T., Xia, Q., Ouyang, Y., Zeng, R., Liu, Q., & Li, T. (2024). Prospectivity and uncertainty analysis of tungsten polymetallogenic mineral resources in the Nanling Metallogenic Belt, South China: A comparative study of AdaBoost, GBDT, and XGBoost algorithms. Natural Resources Research, 33, 1049-1071.
[52]. Nabavi, Z., Mirzehi, M., Dehghani, H., & Ashtari, P. (2023). A hybrid model for back-break prediction using XGBoost machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms in Chadormalu iron mine. Journal of Mining and Environment, 14(2), 689-712.
[53]. Marquina, J., Cotrina, M., Mamani, J., Noriega, E., & Vega, J., & Cruz, J. (2024). Copper ore grade prediction using machine learning techniques in a copper deposit. Journal of Mining and Environment, 15(3), 1011-1027.
[54]. Farhadi, S., Tatullo, S., Boveiri Konari, M., & Afzal, P. (2024). Evaluating StackingC and ensemble models for enhanced lithological classification in geological mapping. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 260, 107441.
[55]. Farhadi, S., Afzal, P., Konari, M., Saein, L., & Sadeghi, B. (2022). Combination of machine learning algorithms with concentration‐area fractal method for soil geochemical anomaly detection in sediment‐hosted Irankuh Pb–Zn deposit, Central Iran. Minerals, 12(6), 689.
[56]. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32.
[57]. Carranza, E., & Laborte, A. (2015). Random forest predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity with small number of prospects and data with missing values in Abra (Philippines). Computers & Geosciences, 74, 60-70.
[58]. Cotrina, M., Marquina, J., Noriega, E., Mamani, J., Ccatamayo, J., Gonzalez, J., & Arango, S. (2024). Predicting open pit mine production using machine learning techniques: A case study in Peru. Journal of Mining and Environment, 15(4), 1345-1355.
[59]. Ford, A. (2020). Practical implementation of random forest-based mineral potential mapping for porphyry Cu–Au mineralization in the Eastern Lachlan Orogen, NSW, Australia. Natural Resources Research, 29, 267-283.
[60]. Lachaud, A., Adam, M., & Mišković, I. (2023). Comparative study of random forest and support vector machine algorithms in mineral prospectivity mapping with limited training data. Minerals, 13(8), 1073.
[61]. Chaudhry, M., Shafi, I., Mahnoor, M., Vargas, D., Thompson, E., & Ashraf, I. (2023). A systematic literature review on identifying patterns using unsupervised clustering algorithms: A data mining perspective. Symmetry (Basel), 15(9), 1679.
[62]. Tarigan, D. (2023). Optimization of the K-means clustering algorithm using Davies–Bouldin index in Iris data classification. KLIK: Media Informasi dan Komunikasi Penelitian, 4(1), 1-7.
)