Document Type : Original Research Paper

Author

University of MohaghDepartment of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iranegh Ardabili

10.22044/jme.2025.16360.3188

Abstract

In open-pit mining, haulage equipment accounts for a significant portion of total operating costs. Optimizing fleet performance is therefore crucial for reducing costs and improving productivity. Within this system, loading equipment plays a key role, as truck efficiency depends heavily on loader performance. The match factor, a metric that evaluates compatibility between loaders and trucks, is commonly used to enhance fleet efficiency. However, many existing approaches fail to account for practical mining conditions such as equipment downtime, accurate truck cycle times, and material fragmentation resulting from blasting. These omissions can lead to inaccurate fleet performance evaluations and higher operational costs. This study proposes an improved match factor method that incorporates these critical variables. It includes equipment downtime, truck cycle time estimates based on travel routes, and material fragmentation. The model applies to both homogeneous and heterogeneous fleet configurations and integrates the operational efficiency coefficient of each machine to reflect real conditions more accurately. The model was tested using data from the Sungun copper mine. The match factor values were calculated both with and without accounting for equipment downtime, and loader capacities were adjusted according to the size distribution of blasted material. Results showed that in heterogeneous fleet operations, the match factor increased from 0.74 to 0.85 when operational efficiency was included. Subsystem analyses also revealed match factor values below 1, indicating a need for additional trucks. Overall, the enhanced model enables more efficient equipment use, reduces loader idle time, and contributes to substantial operating-cost savings.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1]. Moradi Afrapoli, A., Tabesh, M., & Askari-Nasab, H. (2019). A stochastic hybrid simulation-optimization approach towards haul fleet sizing in surface mines. Mining Technology, 128(1), 9-20.
[2]. Dhillon, B. S. (2009). Life cycle costing for engineers. Crc Press.
[3]. Fabrycky, W. J., & Blanchard, B. S. (1991). Life-cycle cost and economic analysis (Vol. 135383234). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[4]. Douglas, J. (1964). Prediction Shovel-Truck Production: A Reconciliation Of Computer And Conventional Estimates.
[5]. Morgan, W. C., & Peterson, L. (1968). Determining shovel-truck productivity. Mining Engineering, 20(12), 76-80.
[6]. Burt, C. N. (2008). An optimisation approach to materials handling in surface mines. Curtin University.
[7]. Dabbagh, A., & Bagherpour, R. (2019). Development of a match factor and comparison of its applicability with ant-colony algorithm in a heterogeneous transportation fleet in an open-pit mine. Journal of Mining Science, 55(1), 45-56.
[8]. Samanta, B., Sarkar, B., & Mukherjee, S. K. (2002). Selection of opencast mining equipment by a multi-criteria decision-making process. Mining Technology, 111(2), 136-142.
[9]. Markeset, T., & Kumar, U. (2018). Application of LCC techniques in selection of mining equipment and technology. In Mine Planning and Equipment Selection 2000 (pp. 635-640). Routledge.
[10]. Michiotis, A., Xerocostas, D., & Galitis, N. (1998). A new integrated system for selecting mining equipment. Computers & industrial engineering, 34(2), 391-397.
[11]. A. Krause, A., & Musingwini, C. (2007). Modelling open pit shovel-truck systems using the Machine Repair Model. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 107(8), 469-476.
[12]. Burt, C., Caccetta, L., Welgama, P., & Fouché, L. (2011). Equipment selection with heterogeneous fleets for multiple-period schedules. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(8), 1498-1509.
[13]. Pasch, O., & Uludag, S. (2018). Optimization of the load-and-haul operation at an opencast colliery. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 118(5), 449-456.
[14]. Edwards, D. J., Malekzadeh, H., & Yisa, S. B. (2001). A linear programming decision tool for selecting the optimum excavator. Structural Survey, 19(2), 113-120.
[15]. Fu, Z., Topal, E., & Erten, O. (2014). Optimisation of a mixed truck fleet schedule through a mathematical model considering a new truck-purchase option. Mining Technology, 123(1), 30-35.
[16]. Ercelebi, S. G., & Bascetin, A. (2009). Optimization of shovel-truck system for surface mining. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 109(7), 433-439.
[17]. Mohtasham, M., Mirzaei-Nasirabad, H., Askari-Nasab, H., & Alizadeh, B. (2021). Truck fleet size selection in open-pit mines based on the match factor using a MINLP model. Mining Technology, 130(3), 159-175.
[18]. Rakhmangulov, A., Burmistrov, K., & Osintsev, N. (2024). Multi-criteria system’s design methodology for selecting open pits dump trucks. Sustainability, 16(2), 863.
[19]. Navidi, S., Motamedi, M., Aghsami, A., & Jolai, F. (2023). AG/M/C//M queueing model for revenue management of shovel-truck systems in an open-pit mine considering carbon emission, a case study. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 18(2), 88-103.
[20]. Xu, H., Liu, F., Liao, J., & Liu, T. (2023). Research on selection and matching of truck-shovel in oversized open-pit mines. Applied Sciences, 13(6), 3851.
[21]. Alshibani, A., Elmaghraby, B., Bubshait, A., Ghaithan, A. M., Mohammed, A., & Hassanain, M. A. (2024). Advancing sustainability: An integrated decision support framework for fleet selection in open pit mining construction. Results in Engineering, 23, 102501.
[22]. Bazzazi, A. A., Osanloo, M., & Karimi, B. (2011). Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: Application of modified VIKOR method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2550-2556.
[23]. Mirhosseyni, S. H. L., & Webb, P. (2009). A hybrid fuzzy knowledge-based expert system and genetic algorithm for efficient selection and assignment of material handling equipment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11875-11887.
[24]. Lashgari, A., Yazdani–Chamzini, A., Fouladgar, M. M., Zavadskas, E. K., Shafiee, S., & Abbate, N. (2012). Equipment selection using fuzzy multi criteria decision making model: key study of Gole Gohar iron min. Engineering economics, 23(2), 125-136.
[25]. Bandopadhyay, S., & Venkatasubramanian, P. (1987). Expert systems as decision aid in surface mine equipment selection. International Journal of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 1(2), 159-165.
[26]. Suglo, R. S., & Al-Hassan, S. (2007). Use of simulation techniques in determining the fleet requirements of an open pit mine. Ghana Mining Journal, 9.
[27]. Dindarloo, S. R., Osanloo, M., & Frimpong, S. (2015). A stochastic simulation framework for truck and shovel selection and sizing in open pit mines. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 115(3), 209-219.
[28]. Ozdemir, B., & Kumral, M. (2019). Simulation-based optimization of truck-shovel material handling systems in multi-pit surface mines. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 95, 36-48.
[29]. Ortiz, C. E. A., Curi, A., & Campos, P. H. (2014). The use of simulation in fleet selection and equipment sizing in mining. In Mine Planning and Equipment Selection: Proceedings of the 22nd MPES Conference, Dresden, Germany, 14th–19th October 2013 (pp. 869-877). Springer International Publishing.
[30]. Mohtasham, M., Mirzaei-Nasirabad, H., Askari-Nasab, H., & Alizadeh, B. (2022). Multi-stage optimization framework for the real-time truck decision problem in open-pit mines: a case study on Sungun copper mine. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 36(7), 461-491.
[31]. Ghaziania, H. H., Monjezi, M., Mousavi, A., Dehghani, H., & Bakhtavar, E. (2021). Design of loading and transportation fleet in open-pit mines using simulation approach and metaheuristic algorithms. Journal of Mining and Environment, 12(4), 1177-1188.