Document Type : Case Study

Authors

Faculty of Mining and Metallurgy Engineering, Amirkabir University of technology, Tehran, Iran

10.22044/jme.2020.9819.1904

Abstract

Due to the gradual deepening of the Mazinu coal seams from the ground surface, both the open-pit (OP) and underground (UG) mining methods can be applied for extracting them. Thus, it is a necessity to determine the interface of these mining methods optimally. The present paper aims to determine this interface by generating different scenarios using the OP phases and their relative underground stopes, and comparing them with each other. In this regard, an economic block model is created based on the calorific value of the coal portions involved by each block along with the required economic and technical parameters. Then using the Lerchs-Grossman algorithm, the OP phases are created. Proportional to each phase, the production scheduling of underground stopes is executed. Finally, in order to opt the best scenario, the net present value of the whole project (OP & UG) achieved from different scenarios are compared with each other. The results obtained indicate that the optimum interface of the OP and UG mining activities correspond to the ultimate OP limit with a maximum depth of 200 m from the ground surface.

Keywords

[1]. Osanloo, M. (1999). Coal Engineering. Naghoos Publishers. pp. 261-270.

[2]. Chikkatur, A.P., Sagar, A.D. and Sankar, T.L. (2009). Sustainable development of the Indian coal sector. Energy, 34, 942-953.

[3]. Soderberg, A, Rausch, D.O. Surface Mining (Section 4.1). Pfleider, E.P., American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers (AIMM), New York: 1968, pp. 142–143.

[4]. Popover, G. (1971). The working of mineral deposits (Translated from the Russian by Shiffer, V.). Moscow: Mir publishers.

[5]. Nilsson, D.S. (1992). Surface vs. Underground Methods. SME Mining Engineering Handbook (Section 23.2), edited by Hartman, H.L. pp. 2058−2068.

[6]. Chen. J., Li. J., Luo., Z. and Guo, D. (2001). Development and Application of Optimum Open-Pit Limits Software for the Combined Mining of Surface and Underground. Proceedings of CAMI Symposium 2001: 303−306.

[7]. Chen, J., Guo, D. and Li, J. (2003). Optimization Principle of Combined Surface and Underground Mining and Its Applications. Journal of Central South University of Technology 2003 (10): 222−225.

[8]. Visser, W.F. and Ding, B. (2007). Optimization of the Transition from Open-Pit to Underground Mining. Proc. 4th AACHEN Int. Mining Symp. High Performance Mine Production. Germany. 131–148.

[9]. Bakhtavar, K., Shahriar, K. and Mirhassani, A. (2012). Optimization of the Transition from Open-Pit to Underground Operation in Combined Mining Using (0-1) Integer Programming. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2012 (112): 1059-1064.

[10]. Newman A, Yano C, Rubio E. “Mining above and below ground: timing the transition”. IEE Transactions 2013 (45): 865-882.

[11]. Dagdelen, K. and Traore, I. (2014). Open-pit transition depth determination through global analysis of open pit and underground mine production scheduling. In Proceedings Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mine Planning Conference. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2014: 195-199.

[12]. Lerchs, H. and Grossman, I.F. (1965). Optimum Design of Open-Pit Mines, Joint CORS and ORSA Conference, Montreal: Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

[13]. Ordin A.A and Vasil’ev, I.V (2015). Optimized Depth of Transition from Open-Pit to Underground Coal Mining. Journal of Mining Science, 2014, Vol. 50 (4): 696–706.

[14]. King, B, Goycoolea, M. and Newman, A. (2017). Optimizing the open-pit to underground mining transition”, European Journal of Operational Research 2017 (257): 297-309.

[15]. MacNeil, J. and Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2017). A stochastic optimization formulation for the transition from open pit to underground mining. Optimization and Engineering 2017 (18): 793–813.

[16]. Soltani, Khaboushan. and A., Osanloo, M. (2019). An Uncertainty-based Transition from Open Pit to Underground Mining. IJE TRANSACTIONS B: Applications Vol. 32 (8), pp 1218-1224.

[17]. Afuma, B., O., Ben-Awuah, E. and Askari-Nasab, H. (2019). A mixed integer linear programming framework for optimizing the extraction strategy of open pit – underground mining options and transitions. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2019.1701968.

[18]. Soltani Khaboushan, A. and Osanloo, M. (2020). Semi-symmetrical production scheduling of an orebody for optimizing the depth of transitioning from open-pit to block caving. Resources Policy (68). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101700.

[19]. Soltani Khaboushan, A. and Osanloo, M. (2019). A Set of Classified Integer Programming (IP) Models for Optimum Transition from Open-Pit to Underground Mining Methods. Natural Resources Research. 2020 (29): 1543-1559.