Document Type: Short Communication

Authors

1 Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Water Research Institute of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 School of Mining, Petroleum & Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

Abstract

Protection of water resources from contamination and detection of the contaminants and their treatments are among the essential issues in the management of water resources. In this work, the time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) surveys were conducted along 7 longitudinal lines in the downstream of the Latian dam in Jajrood (Iran), in order to detect the contamination resulting from the direct injection of a saltwater solution in to the saturated zone in the area. To investigate the pollutant quantities affecting the resistivity of this zone, the temperature and electrical conductivity measurement were carried out using a self-recording device during 20 days (before and after the injection). The results obtained from the self-recording device measurements and ERT surveys indicated that in addition to the salt concentration changes in water, the resistivity changes in the saturated zone were dependent on other factors such as the lithology and absorption of contaminants by the subsurface layers. Furthermore, the expansion of contamination toward the geological trend, sedimentation, and groundwater flow direction of the area were shown.

Keywords

[1]. Rein, A., Hoffmann, R. and Dietrich, P. (2003). Influence of natural time-dependentvariations of electrical conductivity on DC resistivity measurement. Jurnal of Hydrology. 285: 215-232.

[2]. Nesterov, L.I., Bibikov, N.S. and Usmanov, A.S. (1938). Kurs elektropas vedki. Gos. Tech. teor.izd.,Lningrad.

[3]. Gorelik, A.M. (1951). Electrometriceskie opredelenija napravlenija I skorosti podzemnych. Trudy Lab.

[4]. Dachnov, V.N. (1953). Elektriceskaja rasvedka neftjanych igazovych mestorozdenij. Gostotechnizdat. Moskau.

[5]. Fried, J.J. (1951). Groundwater pollution, Developments in water Sience, Vol. 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam .330 P.

[6]. White, P.A. (1988). Measurement of groundwater parameters using salt water injection, Surface resistivity. Groundwater. 26: 179-186.

[7]. White, P.A. (1994). Electrode arrays for measuring groundwater flow direction, velocity. Geophysics. 59: 192-201.

[8]. Morris, M., Steinar, J. S. and Lile, O.B. (1996). Geoelectric monitoring of a salt water injection experiment: modelling, interpretation. Environ. Engng Geophys. 1: 15-34.

[9]. Patton, S. (2001). Optimierung von Salztracertests in Kombinationmit geoelektrischen Gleichstrom-Messungen zur Erkundung hydrogeologischer Fließparameter. Diplomarbeit, Geowissens chaftliche Fakulta¨t der Universita¨t Tu¨bingen.

[10]. Urish, D.W. (1983). The Practical Application of Surface Electrical Resistivity to Detection of Ground-Water Pollution. Ground Water. 21: 144-152.

[11]. Kollmann, W.F.H., Meyer, J.W. and Supper, R. (1992). Geoelectric survey in determining the direction and velocity of groundwater flow, using introduced salt tracer in: Werner, H. (Ed.), Tracer Hydrology, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 109-113.

[12]. Sedaghat, M. (2006). Earth and water resources, Vol. 1, 6th Ed., Payam-e-Noor University Publications, pp 7-8 (In Persian).

[13]. Bernard, J. (2003). Short note on the principles of geophysical methods for groundwater investigations.

[14]. Dachnov, V.N. (1962). Interpretazija resultatov geofiziceskichissledovanij razrezov skavzin. Izdat. Gostoptechizdat., 2.Aufl., Moskau, 547 P.