J. Ziaei; S. Ghadernejad; A. Jafarpour; R. Mikaeil
Abstract
One of the most crucial factors involved in the optimum design and cost estimation of rock sawing process is the rock abrasivity that could result in a significant cost increase. Various methods including direct and indirect tests have been introduced in order to measure rock abrasivity. The Schimazek’s ...
Read More
One of the most crucial factors involved in the optimum design and cost estimation of rock sawing process is the rock abrasivity that could result in a significant cost increase. Various methods including direct and indirect tests have been introduced in order to measure rock abrasivity. The Schimazek’s F-abrasiveness factor ( ) is one of the most common indices to assess rock abrasivity. is the function of three rock parameters including the Brazilian tensile strength ( ), median grain size ( ), and equivalent quartz content ( ). By considering its formulation, it has been revealed that the coefficient of each parameter is equal, which is not correct because each parameter plays a different role in the rock abrasion process. This work aims to modify the original form of by introducing three correction factors. To calculate these correction factors, an integrated method based on a combination of the statistical analysis and probabilistic simulation is applied to a dataset of 15 different andesite rocks. Based on the results obtained, the values of -0.36, 0.3, and -0.89 are suggested as the correction factors of , and , respectively. The performance of the modified Schimazek’s F-abrasiveness factor ( ) is checked not only by the wear rate of diamond wire but also by the cutting rate of the wire sawing process of Andesite rocks. The results obtained indicate that the wear rate and cutting rate of andesite rocks can be reliably predicted using . However, it should be noted that this work is a preliminary one on the limited rock types and further studies are required by incorporating different rock types.
Rock Mechanics
M. T. Hamzaban; H. Memarian; J. Rostami
Abstract
Rock abrasivity is an essential factor for selecting cutting tools, estimating tool wear and life, and ultimately, matching various mechanized excavation systems with a given geologic condition. It also assists engineers to determine economic limits of different cutting tools and machines used in civil ...
Read More
Rock abrasivity is an essential factor for selecting cutting tools, estimating tool wear and life, and ultimately, matching various mechanized excavation systems with a given geologic condition. It also assists engineers to determine economic limits of different cutting tools and machines used in civil and mining projects. The Cerchar abrasion test is a simple and most widely used method for rock abrasivity assessments. However, it has some shortcomings to describe the steel-rock interaction during the cutting process. In this work, two new parameters are used to describe the pin-rock interaction in the Cerchar abrasion test and to evaluate the efficiency of the rock scratching process. A set of 41 different rock samples are tested by a newly developed testing device. The device provides a more precise control of the testing operational parameters, and measures the applied frictional force on the pin and its horizontal and vertical displacements on the sample surface. The results obtained are used to calculate the Modified Cerchar Abrasion Index (MCAI) and the Scratch Energy Index (SEi), as two newly developed parameters. The accuracy of the calculated parameters is discussed. Our investigations show that MCAI has closer correlations with rock mechanical parameters than CAI, and therefore, has a higher potential to estimate the rock cutting tool wear in tunneling applications. Also SEi shows sensible correlations with sample hardness and mechanical properties. The results obtained show that SEi can be used to compare the efficiency of various pin hardnesses to create scratches on various rock samples, and could be used as a determinative parameter in selecting the cutting tool hardness.