Hassan Sarfaraz; Mohadeseh Sarlak; Fatemeh Ashoor; Erfan Amini
Abstract
In rock slopes, block toppling failure is a prevalent instability. In this instability, rock mass consists of a series of dominant parallel discontinuities that are dipping steeply into the slope face, and a series of cross-joints are located normal to the dominant discontinuities. Blocks may slide or ...
Read More
In rock slopes, block toppling failure is a prevalent instability. In this instability, rock mass consists of a series of dominant parallel discontinuities that are dipping steeply into the slope face, and a series of cross-joints are located normal to the dominant discontinuities. Blocks may slide or rotate due to their weight along the natural cross-joints at their base, and the tensile strength does not significantly affect the stability of the rock slope. The rounding edge of rock columns is a special feature of spheroidal weathering. Firstly, a literature review of block toppling instability is presented. Next, applying the Sarma approach, a new theoretical analysis is proposed for the rock columns with rounded edges. One of the advantages of the proposed approach is that by determining the sign of a parameter called KC, the stability status can be specified. The suggested solution is compared with a pre-existing analytical method through examples and case study. Comparisons indicate that the proposed approach has a satisfactory agreement. It can be concluded that with weathering and rounding of the block edges, the safety factor decreases non-linearly. Therefore, this solution can be used to evaluate the blocky toppling failure regarding the erosion phenomenon.
H. Sarfaraz; A.R. Bahrami; R. Samani
Abstract
A common instability in the rock slopes is a toppling failure. If this type of slope failure occurs due to another kind of failure, it is considered as the secondary toppling failure. A type of secondary toppling failure is the slide-head-toppling failure. In this instability, the upper portion of the ...
Read More
A common instability in the rock slopes is a toppling failure. If this type of slope failure occurs due to another kind of failure, it is considered as the secondary toppling failure. A type of secondary toppling failure is the slide-head-toppling failure. In this instability, the upper portion of the slope is toppled, and the pressure caused by the overturning of rock blocks leads to a semi-circular sliding in the soil mass at the slope toe. This instability is examined through the theoretical analysis and physical modelling. Firstly, the failure mechanism mentioned above is described. Next, the slide-head-toppling failure is studied through seven numerical simulations. The Phase2 and UDEC softwares, as the finite element and distinct element methods, respectively, are used in this work. Different kinds of slide-head-toppling failure are modelled such as the blocky, block-flexural, and flexural toppling failures. The numerical modelling results are compared with the existing physical tests and theoretical approaches. This comparison illustrates that the safety factor is underestimated due to the plane strain supposition in numerical modelling. However, the side-friction in the physical models has violated this assumption. The results obtained demonstrate that the distinct element method has an acceptable accuracy compared to the finite element method. Thus this numerical code can be used in order to examine the mentioned failure.
Rock Mechanics
H. Sarfaraz; M. Amini
Abstract
One of the most important instabilities of rock slopes is toppling failure. Among the types of toppling failure, block-flexural failures are more common instability which occurs in nature. In this failure, some rock blocks break because of tensile stresses, and some overturn under their weights, and ...
Read More
One of the most important instabilities of rock slopes is toppling failure. Among the types of toppling failure, block-flexural failures are more common instability which occurs in nature. In this failure, some rock blocks break because of tensile stresses, and some overturn under their weights, and next to all of them topple together. Physical and theoretical modeling of this failure is studied by Amini et al. in 2015. Due to the complexity of this failure mechanism, no appropriate numerical model has been proposed so far. In this research, first, a literature review of toppling failure is summarized. Then, using UDEC software as distinct element method (DEM), the experimental models were analyzed numerically, and Voronoi joint model was applied to simulate the failure. The results of numerical simulations are compared with the outcomes of physical models and analytical solution. The comparison illustrates that numerical modeling has good agreement with corresponding experimental tests and theoretical approach. Also, the results show that although the mechanism of block-flexural toppling failure is complicated, the numerical code is well capable to analyze of this failure.
Rock Mechanics
H. Sarfaraz; M. H. Khosravi; M. Amini
Abstract
In layered and blocky rock slopes, toppling failure is a common mode of instability that may occur in mining engineering. If this type of slope failure occurs as a consequence of another type of failure, it is referred to as the secondary toppling failure. “Slide-head-toppling” is a type ...
Read More
In layered and blocky rock slopes, toppling failure is a common mode of instability that may occur in mining engineering. If this type of slope failure occurs as a consequence of another type of failure, it is referred to as the secondary toppling failure. “Slide-head-toppling” is a type of secondary toppling failures, where the upper part of the slope is toppled as a consequence of a semi-circular sliding failure at the toe of the slope. In this research work, the slide-head-toppling failure is examined through a series of numerical modeling. Phase 2, as a software written based on the finite element method, is used in this work. Different types of slide-head-toppling failures including blocky, block-flexural, and flexural are simulated. A good agreement can be observed when the results of the numerical modeling are compared with those for the pre-existing physical modeling and analytical method.
