Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, India

10.22044/jme.2023.13807.2565

Abstract

Among all methods for ground improvement, stone columns have become more popular recently, owing to their simple construction and plentiful availability of raw materials. However, in relatively softer soils, ordinary stone columns (OSCs) experience significant bulging owing to the minimal confinement offered by the surrounding soil. This necessitates the introduction of reinforcements in the stone column, to enhance their strength in such circumstances. The subject of this investigation was the assessment of the behavior of horizontally reinforced stone columns (HRSCs), introduced in layered soil, under the raft foundation. The soil material included was idealised using an isotropic linearly elastic fully plastic model with a Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. There are a total of six separate factors required by the Mohr-Coulomb criterion. These include cohesion (c), the soil's dry unit weight (γd), the Poisson ratio (μ), the angle of internal friction (φ), the angle of dilatancy (ψ), and the Young's modulus of elasticity (E). At the very beginning, the load-settlement response of unreinforced soil was evaluated followed by a comparative study between square and triangular arrangements of stone columns, at different spacings, under the raft, to arrive at the configuration that encounters minimal settlements and lateral deformations. Furthermore, circular discs of suitable geogrid material were introduced along the length of the stone column. The elastic behaviour of geogrids is governed by two properties: tensile modulus and yield strength. The load-settlement behavior and lateral deformations of the resulting reinforced stone columns, with OSCs were compared. Furthermore, the spacing between the circular discs of geogrids was kept at D/2, D, 2D, and 3D, where D is the diameter of the stone column. According to the findings of an investigation conducted using FEM software, the performance of a granular pile group that is laid out in the shape of a triangle encounters much less lateral deformation and settlement than the square arrangement. The results also show that the performance of HRSCs was way better than those of OSCs, under the same in-situ soil conditions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1]. Munfakh, G. A., Sarkar, S. K., & Castelli, R. J. (1984). PAPER 20 Performance of a test embankment founded on stone columns. In Piling and ground treatment (pp. 259-265). Thomas Telford Publishing.
[2]. Mitchell, J. K., & Huber, T. R. (1985). Performance of a stone column foundation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 111(2), 205-223.
[3]. Bergado, D. T., & Lam, F. L. (1987). Full scale load test of granular piles with different densities and different proportions of gravel and sand on soft Bangkok clay. Soils and foundations, 27(1), 86-93.
[4]. McKelvey, D., Sivakumar, V., Bell, A., & Graham, J. (2004). Modelling vibrated stone columns in soft clay. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 157(3), 137-149.
[5]. Ambily, A. P., & Gandhi, S. R. (2007). Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 133(4), 405-415.
[6]. Fu, J., Safaei, M. R., Haeri, H., Sarfarazi, V., Fatehi Marji, M., Xu, L., & Arefnia, A. (2022). Experimental investigation on deformation behavior of circular underground opening in hard soil using a 3D physical model. Journal of Mining and Environment, 13(3), 727-749.
[7]. Zhou, L., Jalalichi, Z., Sarfarazi, V., Haeri, H., Moarefvand, P., Marji, M. F., & Fattahi, S. (2022). PLAXIS 3D simulation, FLAC3D analysis and in situ monitoring of Excavation stability. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, An Int'l Journal, 84(6), 743-765.
[8]. Haeri, H., Sarfarazi, V., & Marji, M. F. (2020). Numerical simulation of the effect of confining pressure and tunnel depth on the vertical settlement using particle flow code (with direct tensile strength calibration in PFC Modeling). Smart Structures and Systems, 25(4), 433-446.
[9]. Haeri, H., Sarfarazi, V., Zhu, Z., Marji, M. F., & Masoumi, A. (2019). Investigation of shear behavior of soil-concrete interface. Smart Structures and Systems, 23(1), 81-90.
[10]. Haeri, H., Sarfarazi, V., Shemirani, A. B., Gohar, H. P., & Nejati, H. R. (2017). Field evaluation of soil liquefaction and its confrontation in fine-grained Sandy soils (case study: south of Hormozgan Province). Journal of Mining Science, 53, 457-468.
[11]. Rezaei, M. M., Lajevardi, S. H., Saba, H., Ghalandarzadeh, A., & Zeighami, E. (2019). Laboratory study on single stone columns reinforced with steel bars and discs. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 5, 1-14.
[12]. Bazzazian Bonab, S., Lajevardi, S. H., Saba, H. R., Ghalandarzadeh, A., & Mirhosseini, S. M. (2020). Experimental studies on single reinforced stone columns with various positions of geotextile. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 5, 1-12.
[13]. Van Impe, W. F., & Madhav, M. R. (1992). Analysis and settlement of dilating stone column reinforced soil. ÖIAZ, 137(3), 114-121.
[14]. Alamgir, M., Miura, N., Poorooshasb, H. B., & Madhav, M. R. (1996). Deformation analysis of soft ground reinforced by columnar inclusions. Computers and Geotechnics, 18(4), 267-290.
[15]. Bergado, D. T., & Lam, F. L. (1987). Full scale load test of granular piles with different densities and different proportions of gravel and sand on soft Bangkok clay. Soils and foundations, 27(1), 86-93.
[16]. Ranjan, G. (1989). Ground treated with granular piles and its response under load. Indian Geotech J, 19(1), 1-86.
[17]. Bouassida, M., De Buhan, P., & Dormieux, L. (1995). Bearing capacity of a foundation resting on a soil reinforced by a group of columns. Géotechnique, 45(1), 25-34.
[18]. Pulko, B., & Majes, B. (2005). Simple and accurate prediction of settlements of stone column reinforced soil. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering (pp. 1401-1404). IOS Press.
[19]. Suleiman, M. T., Ni, L., & Raich, A. (2014). Development of pervious concrete pile ground-improvement alternative and behavior under vertical loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140(7), 04014035.
[20]. Thakur, A., Rawat, S., & Gupta, A. K. (2021). Experimental and numerical modelling of group of geosynthetic-encased stone columns. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 6, 1-17.
[21]. Nav, M. A., Rahnavard, R., Noorzad, A., & Napolitano, R. (2020, June). Numerical evaluation of the behavior of ordinary and reinforced stone columns. In Structures (Vol. 25, pp. 481-490). Elsevier.
[22]. PLAXIS 3D: Geotechnical Engineering Software. https://www.bentley.com/software/plaxis-3d/.
[23]. Möller, S. C. (2006). Tunnel induced settlements and structural forces in linings (pp. 108-125). Stuttgart, Germany: Univ. Stuttgart, Inst. f. Geotechnik.
[24]. Nayak, S., Balaji, M., & Preetham, H. K. (2020). A study on the behaviour of stone columns in a layered soil system. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 7, 85-102.
[25]. IS 803-1976 Code of Practice for Design, Fabrication and Erection of Vertical Mild Steel Cylindrical Welded Oil Storage Tanks, BIS, New Delhi
[26]. IS 15284 (Part 1): 2003. Design and Construction for Ground Improvement – Guidelines, Part 1 Stone Columns.