Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Mining Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

2 Senior Technologist (Mining), Process Technology Group, Tata Steel Limited, Jamshedpur, India

Abstract

A novel underground mining method is proposed to extract friable chromite ore bodies in weak and weathered limonitic host rock below an open-pit mine. The conventional underground methods do not instil confidence since GSI (Geological Strength Index) of ore bodies and host rock lies below 35. Series of dimensions of transverse stopes along the strike are suggested based on a detailed analysis of multiple mining and backfilling operations by simulating 36 three-dimensional numerical models. For each operation or sequence, a strength-based “Mining Sequence Factor (MSF)” is devised that helps quantifying its equivalent strength compared to in-situ conditions. This factor along with the average equivalent plastic strain (AEPS) developed on the pillars as obtained from numerical models is used to determine the safe operations with desired yearly production target. The paper provides an in-depth analysis of this method and suggests minimum pillar dimensions of 40 m, whether in-situ or backfilled. The paper, in addition, lays the design of underground drives and their support system as per NGI (Norwegian Geotechnical Institute) guidelines and 3D numerical studies, the performance of which is analysed considering distribution of stress and equivalent plastic strain.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  • Soltani Khaboushan, A., & Osanloo, M. (2021). Determination of an optimum interface between open-pit and underground mining activities in Mazinu coal mine of Tabas power plant. Journal of Mining and Environment12(1), 139-149.
  • Henning, J. G. (2007, May). Review of crown pillar investigations in a historic mine camp. In ARMA Canada-US Rock Mechanics Symposium(p. ARMA-07). ARMA.
  • Hutchinson, D. J., Phillips, C., & Cascante, G. (2002). Risk considerations for crown pillar stability assessment for mine closure planning. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering20, 41-64.
  • Bakhtavar, E., Oraee, K., & Shahriar, K. (2010). Determination of the optimum crown pillar thickness between open-pit and block caving. In 29th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining(pp. 325-332). Dept. of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University.
  • Xu, S., Suorineni, F. T., An, L., Li, Y. H., & Jin, C. Y. (2019). Use of an artificial crown pillar in transition from open-pit to underground mining. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,117, 118-131.
  • Nicholas, D. E. (1981). Method selection-A numerical approach. Design and operation of caving and sublevel Stopping mines, 39-53.
  • Hartman, H.L. (1987). Introductory Mining Engineering, Wiley.
  • Dehghani, H., Siami, A., & Haghi, P. (2017). A new model for mining method selection based on grey and TODIM methods. Journal of Mining and Environment8(1), 49-60.
  • Alpay, S., & Yavuz, M. (2007). A decision support system for underground mining method selection. In New Trends in Applied Artificial Intelligence: 20th International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, IEA/AIE 2007, Kyoto, Japan, June 26-29, 2007. Proceedings 20(pp. 334-343). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Karadogan, A., Bascetin, A., & Kahriman, A. (2001). A new approach in selection of underground mining method. International Scientific Conference SGEM. Bulgaria.
  • Karadogan, A., Kahriman, A., & Ozer., U. (2008). Application of fuzzy set theory in the selection of underground mining method. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining & Metallurgy 108(2), 73-79.
  • Yavuz, M., Iphar, M., & Once, G. (2008). The optimum support design selection by using AHP method for the main haulage road in WLC Tuncbilek colliery. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology23(2), 111-119.
  • Naghadehi, M. Z., Mikaeil, R., & Ataei, M. (2009). The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran. Expert systems with applications36(4), 8218-8226.
  • Jamshidi, M., Ataei, M., Sereshki, F., & Jalali, S.M.E. (2009). The application of AHP approach to selection of optimum underground mining method, case study: Jajarm bauxite mine (Iran). Archives of Mining Sciences 54(1), 103-117.
  • Yavuz, M. (2015). The application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Yager’s method in underground mining method selection problem. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 29(5), 453-475.
  • Zhao, X. D., Li, L. C., Tang, C. A., & Zhang, H. X. (2012). Stability of boundary pillars in transition from open pit to underground mining. Journal of Central South University, 19(11), 3256-3265.
  • Dintwe, T. K. M., Sasaoka, T., Shimada, H., Hamanaka, A., & Moses, D. (2022). Evaluating the influence of underground mining sequence under an open pit mine. Journal of Mining Science, 58(1), 35-43.
  • Phaisopha, S., Shimada, H., Sasaoka, T., Hamanaka, A., Pongpanya, P., Shorin, S., & Senthavisouk, K. (2023). A stope mining design with consideration of hanging wall when transitioning from open-pit mining to underground mining for Sepon gold mine deposit, Laos. Mining, 3(3), 463-482.
  • He, K., Swarbrick, G., & Sullivan, T. (2020). Numerical modelling of underground and open pit interaction in a gold mine. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Slope Stability in Open-Pit Mining and Civil Engineering (pp. 1031-1046). Australian Centre for Geomechanics.
  • Bieniawski, Z. T. (1990). Tunnel design by rock mass classifications. Pennsylvania State University, Dept of Mineral Engineering.
  • 2022. Using the Q-System, rock mass classification and support design. NGI, Oslo, Norway.
  • Dalgic, S. (2000). The influence of weak rocks on excavation and support of the Beykoz Tunnel, Turkey. Engineering geology58(2), 137-148.
  • Dalgic, S. (2002). Tunneling in squeezing rock, the Bolu tunnel, Anatolian Motorway, Turkey. Engineering Geology67(1-2), 73-96.
  • Aygar, E. B. (2020). Evaluation of new Austrian tunnelling method applied to Bolu tunnel's weak rocks. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 12(3), 541-556.
  • Opolony, K., Witthaus, H. (2003). Comparison of multiple- and single-entry roadway systems for highly stressed longwalls. In S. S. Peng, C. Mark, A. W. Khair, K. A. Heasley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Ground Control in Mining (pp. 33-36). West Virginia University.
  • Witthaus, H., & Polysos, N. (2007). Rock mass classification in German hard-coal mining: standards and application. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Rock Mass Classification in Underground Mining.
  • Palmstrom, A., & Stille, H. (2007). Ground behaviour and rock engineering tools for underground excavations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 22(4), 363-376.
  • Stille, H., & Palmström, A. (2008). Ground behaviour and rock mass composition in underground excavations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23(1), 46-64.
  • Sanchez Fernandez, J. L., & Teran Benitez, C. E. (1994). Túnel de Trasvase Yacambú-Quibor: Avance actual de los trabajos de excavación mediante la utilización de soportes flexibles aplicados a rocas con grandes deformaciones. In Proceedings of the IV Congreso Sudamericano de Mecanica de Rocas, Santiago 1, 489-497.
  • Yan, P., Zhenguo, Z., Lu, W., Fan, Y., Chen, X., & Shan, Z. (2015). Mitigation of rock burst events by blasting techniques during deep-tunnel excavation. Engineering Geology, 188, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGGEO.2015.01.011
  • Cao, C., Shi, C., Lei, M., Yang, W., & Liu, J. (2018). Squeezing failure of tunnels: a case study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology77, 188-203.
  • Marinos, V. (2014). Tunnel behaviour and support associated with the weak rock masses of flysch. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 6(3), 227-239.
  • Hoek, E. (1998, November). Tunnel support in weak rock. In Keynote address, Symposium of Sedimentary Rock Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lee, S., & Tseng, D. (2011). Review and perspective of expressway tunnels in Taiwan, China. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering3, 385-397.
  • Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C., & Corkum, B. (2002). Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. In Proceedings of NARMS-Tac1(1), 267-273.
  • Drucker, D. C., & Prager, W. (1952). Soil mechanics and plastic analysis for limit design. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 10(2), 157-165.
  • Dondapati, G. K. (2023). Evaluation of mechanical behaviour of polymeric skin support for mining applications using experimental and numerical modelling methods (Doctoral Dissertation). IIT Kharagpur Institutional Dissertational Repository. http://www.idr.iitkgp.ac.in/xmlui/
  • Carrieri, G., Grasso, P., Mahtab, A., & Pelizza, S. (1991). Ten years of experience in the use of umbrella-arch for tunnelling. In Proceedings of the SIG Conference on Soil and Rock Improvement, 1, 99-111.
  • Bureau of Indian Standards. (2000). IS 456: Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards.