Mineral Processing
Sajad Kolahi; Mohammad Jahani Chegeni; Asghar Azizi
Abstract
In Part 2 of this research work, five types of liners, i.e. wave, step, step@, ship-lap, and ship-lap@, are examined. These liners all have similar connected lifters with different volumes. Their difference is in the width, height, and type of the lifter profile. All the five liner types, from 8 to 64 ...
Read More
In Part 2 of this research work, five types of liners, i.e. wave, step, step@, ship-lap, and ship-lap@, are examined. These liners all have similar connected lifters with different volumes. Their difference is in the width, height, and type of the lifter profile. All the five liner types, from 8 to 64 lifters, are simulated using the Discrete Element Method (DEM). In this research work, for the first time, data from the sum of the kinetic and potential energies of individual balls (79,553 particles) are used to find the appropriate range for the number of lifters. In other words, the kinetic and potential energies of all particles within the system (inside the ball mill) are the basis for determining the appropriate number of lifters. The results suggest that for the wave liner, the appropriate range of the number of lifters is between 8 and 16, for the step, step@, and ship-lap liners; it is between 12 and 20, and for the ship-lap@ liner, it is between 8 and 20. In fact, using the data on the kinetic and potential energies of the balls inside the mill, it is possible to determine the appropriate range of the number of lifters, which is done for the first time in this study. In general, it is suggested that the data on the kinetic and potential energies of the balls can be used to determine the number of mill lifters, and unlike what has been done. So far, by other researchers, the number of mill lifters should not be determined solely by using its diameter or the dimensions of the lifters. Also the effect of mill-rotation direction on the values of kinetic and potential energies in step and ship-lap liners is investigated. It is shown that the step@ and ship-lap@ liners transfer more energy to the balls than the step and ship-lap liners, and have a suitable direction of rotation.
Mineral Processing
Mohammad Jahani Chegeni; Sajad Kolahi; Asghar Azizi
Abstract
Consumed energy is the most important issue and concern in industrial ball mills, and includes a major part of the costs of mineral processing plants. By using suitable liners and the optimal lifter count, the energy of the mill is properly transferred to the balls. In Part 1 of this research work, five ...
Read More
Consumed energy is the most important issue and concern in industrial ball mills, and includes a major part of the costs of mineral processing plants. By using suitable liners and the optimal lifter count, the energy of the mill is properly transferred to the balls. In Part 1 of this research work, five types of liners, i.e. Lorain, Osborn, Rib, cuboid, and Hi-lo, are examined. These liners all have separate lifters with the same volume. Their difference is in the width, height, and type of lifter profile. First, all types of liners are simulated with four lifters using the Discrete Element Method (DEM). Then the lifter count is increased four by four to fill the entire wall of the mill with lifters. Based on this, Lorain liner from 4 to 24 lifters, Osborn liner from 4 to 120 lifters, Rib liner from 4 to 40 lifters, and cuboid and Hi-lo liners from 4 to 64 lifters are simulated. For the first time, the kinetic (KE) and potential (PE) energies as well as the sum of these two energies (TE) of all the balls are calculated, and compared in the entire duration of the simulation from 0–13s for all the liner types and lifter counts mentioned above. Finally, by using data related to KE, PE, and TE for each type of liner, the optimal lifter count is obtained. Accordingly, 16 to 20 lifters are recommended for the Lorain liner, 64 to 76 lifters for the Osborn liner, 24 to 32 lifters for the Rib liner, 44 lifters for the cuboid liner, and 36 to 44 lifters for the Hi-lo liner.
Mineral Processing
S. Shahraki; M. Karamoozian; A. Azizi
Abstract
Sulfur is one of the most significant impurities in coal, which reduces the quality of coal and also results in environmental pollution. This work was aimed to investigate the removal of sulfur from coal by the leaching method employing parameters expected to affect the removal rate such as acid concentration ...
Read More
Sulfur is one of the most significant impurities in coal, which reduces the quality of coal and also results in environmental pollution. This work was aimed to investigate the removal of sulfur from coal by the leaching method employing parameters expected to affect the removal rate such as acid concentration (10-30%), temperature (40-80 °C), and reaction time (40-100 min). A response surface methodology using Box-Behnken design was employed to maximize, model, and evaluate the factors affecting the desulfurization process. The results obtained indicated that the desulfurization value increased with increase in the acid concentration, temperature, and reaction time. A quadratic model with a high correlation coefficient (R2=0.98) is proposed and developed for the relationship between the removal value and the influential factors. The modeling results demonstrated that the significance degree of factors was in the order of acid concentration>temperature>reaction time. It was also found that the maximum desulfurization (about 87%) could be obtained under the optimal conditions of acid concentration=25%, temperature=80 °C, and leaching time=84 minutes.
Asghar Azizi; Ali Dehghani; Seyyed Zioddin Shafaei
Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the controllable operating parameters influence, including pH, solid content, collector, co-collector, and depressant dose, and conditioning time, on apatite flotation kinetics. Four first order flotation kinetic models are tested on batch flotation ...
Read More
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the controllable operating parameters influence, including pH, solid content, collector, co-collector, and depressant dose, and conditioning time, on apatite flotation kinetics. Four first order flotation kinetic models are tested on batch flotation time-recovery profiles. The results of batch flotation tests and the fitting of first-order kinetic models to assess the influence of operating parameters on the flotation kinetics indicated that model with fast and slow - floating components and classical model gave the best and the worst fit for experimental data, respectively. Also, rectangular distribution of floatabilities and gamma distribution of floatabilities fitted the experimental data well. In this study, the model with rectangular distribution of floatabilities associated with fractional factorial experimental design was employed to evaluate the effect of six main parameters on kinetic parameters (R_∞, K). The result indicated that linear effects of depressant dose, conditioning time, and the interaction effects of solid concentration and pH statistically were important on ultimate recovery but the significant parameters for flotation rate constant were linear effects of solids content, depressant dosage and the interaction effect between pH and conditioning time. Regression equations obtained to relate between flotation operation and kinetic parameters.
