Mineral Processing
Mohammad Jahani Chegeni; Sajad Kolahi; Asghar Azizi
Abstract
Consumed energy is the most important issue and concern in industrial ball mills, and includes a major part of the costs of mineral processing plants. By using suitable liners and the optimal lifter count, the energy of the mill is properly transferred to the balls. In Part 1 of this research work, five ...
Read More
Consumed energy is the most important issue and concern in industrial ball mills, and includes a major part of the costs of mineral processing plants. By using suitable liners and the optimal lifter count, the energy of the mill is properly transferred to the balls. In Part 1 of this research work, five types of liners, i.e. Lorain, Osborn, Rib, cuboid, and Hi-lo, are examined. These liners all have separate lifters with the same volume. Their difference is in the width, height, and type of lifter profile. First, all types of liners are simulated with four lifters using the Discrete Element Method (DEM). Then the lifter count is increased four by four to fill the entire wall of the mill with lifters. Based on this, Lorain liner from 4 to 24 lifters, Osborn liner from 4 to 120 lifters, Rib liner from 4 to 40 lifters, and cuboid and Hi-lo liners from 4 to 64 lifters are simulated. For the first time, the kinetic (KE) and potential (PE) energies as well as the sum of these two energies (TE) of all the balls are calculated, and compared in the entire duration of the simulation from 0–13s for all the liner types and lifter counts mentioned above. Finally, by using data related to KE, PE, and TE for each type of liner, the optimal lifter count is obtained. Accordingly, 16 to 20 lifters are recommended for the Lorain liner, 64 to 76 lifters for the Osborn liner, 24 to 32 lifters for the Rib liner, 44 lifters for the cuboid liner, and 36 to 44 lifters for the Hi-lo liner.
Mineral Processing
Sajad Kolahi; Mohammad Jahani Chegeni; Asghar Azizi
Abstract
In Part 2 of this research work, five types of liners, i.e. wave, step, step@, ship-lap, and ship-lap@, are examined. These liners all have similar connected lifters with different volumes. Their difference is in the width, height, and type of the lifter profile. All the five liner types, from 8 to 64 ...
Read More
In Part 2 of this research work, five types of liners, i.e. wave, step, step@, ship-lap, and ship-lap@, are examined. These liners all have similar connected lifters with different volumes. Their difference is in the width, height, and type of the lifter profile. All the five liner types, from 8 to 64 lifters, are simulated using the Discrete Element Method (DEM). In this research work, for the first time, data from the sum of the kinetic and potential energies of individual balls (79,553 particles) are used to find the appropriate range for the number of lifters. In other words, the kinetic and potential energies of all particles within the system (inside the ball mill) are the basis for determining the appropriate number of lifters. The results suggest that for the wave liner, the appropriate range of the number of lifters is between 8 and 16, for the step, step@, and ship-lap liners; it is between 12 and 20, and for the ship-lap@ liner, it is between 8 and 20. In fact, using the data on the kinetic and potential energies of the balls inside the mill, it is possible to determine the appropriate range of the number of lifters, which is done for the first time in this study. In general, it is suggested that the data on the kinetic and potential energies of the balls can be used to determine the number of mill lifters, and unlike what has been done. So far, by other researchers, the number of mill lifters should not be determined solely by using its diameter or the dimensions of the lifters. Also the effect of mill-rotation direction on the values of kinetic and potential energies in step and ship-lap liners is investigated. It is shown that the step@ and ship-lap@ liners transfer more energy to the balls than the step and ship-lap liners, and have a suitable direction of rotation.
M. Jahani Chegeni; S. Kolahi
Abstract
The number of lifters in the liner of ball mills and the mill rotation speed are among the most significant factors affecting the behavior of grinding charge (balls) and their motion trajectory, and consequently, the comminution mechanism in these mills. In this research, in order to find a suitable ...
Read More
The number of lifters in the liner of ball mills and the mill rotation speed are among the most significant factors affecting the behavior of grinding charge (balls) and their motion trajectory, and consequently, the comminution mechanism in these mills. In this research, in order to find a suitable range for the number of lifters in the liner of ball mills, the DEM method is utilized. Initially, a pilot-scale ball mill with dimensions of 2.0 m × 1.11 m without any lifter is simulated. Afterwards, by adding, respectively, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 20, 26, 30, and 32 cuboid lifter(s) with dimensions of 2 m × 5 cm × 5 cm, nine other separate simulations are performed. The influences of the number of cuboid lifters on the two new factors introduced here, namely ‘head height’ (HH) and ‘impact zone length’ (IZL) at various mill speeds, that is, 70% and 80% of its critical speed (CS) are investigated. The results indicate that in order to find a suitable range for the number of lifters in the liner of ball mills, it is necessary to consider these two parameters simultaneously as the criteria for selecting the appropriate range, That is, liners that simultaneously produce both a higher HH and a greater IZL are more suitable for use in the industry. The results also demonstrate that the suitable range for the number of cuboid lifters in the liner of ball mills is between 16 and 32, which field research on the ball mills of three different plants in the industry confirms the accuracy of the results obtained in this research. Unlike the previous research works, it has now been shown that the number of ball mill lifters does not only depend on the diameter of the mill but also depends on the width, height, angle of the lifter, and generally on the type of lifter.
