Amir Mohammad Nasrollahzadeh Bafti; Mohammad Jahani Chegeni; Ahmad Moghooeinejad; Zahra Manafi
Abstract
Flotation is the most important method for processing sulfide copper ores. Due to the high cost and environmental hazards caused by the chemical reagents used in this process (collectors, frothers, pH regulators, depressants, etc.), the possibility of replacing all these reagents or at least some of ...
Read More
Flotation is the most important method for processing sulfide copper ores. Due to the high cost and environmental hazards caused by the chemical reagents used in this process (collectors, frothers, pH regulators, depressants, etc.), the possibility of replacing all these reagents or at least some of them are of special importance through environmentally friendly methods such as bio-flotation using halophilic bacteria. These bacteria have the ability of growth and proliferation in salty media and relatively neutral pHs such as sea salty water. In this research work, the four types of halophilic bacteria Halobacillus sp., Alkalibacillus almallahensis, Marinobacter sp., and Alkalibacillus sp. are studied to replace frothers (MIBC and F7240), depressant (sodium metabisulfite), and pH regulator (lime) in sulfide copper flotation using a Denver laboratory flotation cell. The results obtained indicate that each of the four types of bacteria mentioned above along with collectors (gasoil, Z11, and C7240) as the only chemical reagents (bio-flotation + collector) can depress pyrite better than the bacteria-free mode (flotation + all chemical reagents). Iron recovery in tailings in the standard flotation test is 46.8%, which is, respectively, increased to 91.9%, 74.5%, 70.3%, and 76.9% using the halophilic bacteria of Halobacillus sp., Alkalibacillus almallahensis, Marinobacter sp., and Alkalibacillus sp. On the other hand, the recovery of chalcopyrite using the bio-flotation method is lower than its recovery using the flotation method. Copper recovery in the concentrate in the standard flotation test is 89.1%, which is reached to 58.8%, 71.4%, 62.5%, and 69.4%, respectively, using the above bacteria in the bio-flotation method.
Amirmohammad Nasrollahzadeh; Mohammad Jahani Chegeni; Ahmad Moghooeinejad; Zahra Manafi
Abstract
Due to the increasing consumption of lime in the flotation process to increase the pH of the system and create an alkaline environment, as well as its gradual increase in cost, the attention of researchers has been drawn to perform flotation operations in a neutral environment. Halophilic bacteria have ...
Read More
Due to the increasing consumption of lime in the flotation process to increase the pH of the system and create an alkaline environment, as well as its gradual increase in cost, the attention of researchers has been drawn to perform flotation operations in a neutral environment. Halophilic bacteria have the potential to replace flotation reducers such as lime because flotation can be done with their help at neutral pH as well. Also, due to the buffer effect of sea water, which is the chosen medium for bio-flotation, the use of bio-flotation method reduces the use of drinking water, and also reduces the consumption of chemicals. In this research work, five types of halophilic bacteria are studied for pyrite bio-depression and chalcopyrite flotation. Bio-flotation experiments are conducted using Hallimond tubes, and the bacteria Halobacillus sp., Alkalibacillus almallahensis, and Alkalibacillus sp. had better performance in pyrite depression and chalcopyrite flotation than other bacteria. The recovery of pyrite depression when using them was 30.9, 30.3, and 34.0 %, respectively, and the recovery of chalcopyrite flotation by them was equal to 52.9, 68.6, and 55.7, respectively, which indicates the high selectivity of these bacteria in flotation. In addition to the above tests, the effect of the combination of these three types of bacteria on pyrite depression and chalcopyrite flotation was also studied. The results obtained indicate that in the combination (mix) test of all three types of bacteria (33.3% of each type), pyrite was depressed better than other tests, and its recovery was 27.5%, which was lower than the single bacteria tests. Also, the effect of the combination of these three types of bacteria on the flotation of chalcopyrite is investigated, and its recovery was 72.6%, which was higher than the single bacteria tests. On the other hand, considering that the recovery of chalcopyrite in the three-bacteria combination tests was is higher than the single-bacteria and two-bacteria tests, it can be concluded that the combination of all three bacteria can cause a better synergism and improve their performance in micro-flotation tests.
