Rock Mechanics
Faezeh Barri; Hamid Chakeri; Mohammad Darbor; Hamed Haghkish
Abstract
Excavation with Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) in urban environments can have risks, such as ground surface settlement. The empty space between the cutterhead and the segment should be filled with suitable grout during the excavation. Nowadays, using grout behind the segment and other fillers fill the empty ...
Read More
Excavation with Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) in urban environments can have risks, such as ground surface settlement. The empty space between the cutterhead and the segment should be filled with suitable grout during the excavation. Nowadays, using grout behind the segment and other fillers fill the empty space behind the segment and reduce the amount of ground surface settlement. Undoubtedly, using a grout with appropriate mechanical behavior can be a suitable substitute for excavated soil in mechanized tunneling. In this research, the mechanical behavior of the grout behind the segment during injection into the space between the soil and the segment and its mixture with the soil is studied. Also, the effect of mechanical properties of grout mixed with soil on the ground surface settlement is investigated using numerical modeling. The components of two-component grout of this study comprises Sufian type 2 cement with 28-day strength of 44 MPa and density of 3050 kg/m3, Salafchegan bentonite with density of 2132 kg/m3 and precipitator of liquid sodium silicate with density of the solution 1500 kg/m3. The results of the laboratory studies indicated that mixing the grout and soil increases the mechanical properties of grout significantly. Increasing the soil in the mixture of soil and grout up to 40% increases the uniaxial compressive strength up to 300%, the elasticity of modulus up to 156% and the cohesion of the mixture up to 100%. On the other hand, based on the results of numerical modeling, the proper injection pressure can significantly reduce the ground surface settlement. Increasing the injection pressure from 0 to 120 kPa has a 17% influence on the reduction of ground surface settlement.
Rock Mechanics
Ali Kazempour Osalou; Sayfoddin Moosazadeh; Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou; Mohammad-Reza Baghban Golpasand
Abstract
Nowadays, tunnel excavation plays a major role in the development of countries. Due to the complex and challenging ground conditions, a comprehensive study and analysis must be done before, during, and after the excavation of tunnels. Hence, the importance of study and evaluation of ground settlement ...
Read More
Nowadays, tunnel excavation plays a major role in the development of countries. Due to the complex and challenging ground conditions, a comprehensive study and analysis must be done before, during, and after the excavation of tunnels. Hence, the importance of study and evaluation of ground settlement is dramatically increased since many tunnel projects are performed in urban areas, where there are plenty of constructions, buildings, and facilities. For this reason, the control and prediction of ground settlement is one of the complicated topics in the field of risk engineering. Therefore, in this paper, the proportional hazard model (PHM) is used to analyze and study the ground settlement induced by Tabriz Metro Line 2 (TML2) tunneling. The PHM method is a semi-parametric regression method that can enter environmental conditions or factors affecting settlement probability. These influential factors are used as risk factors in the analysis. After establishing a database for a case study and using a proportional hazard model for surface settlement analysis, and then by evaluating the effect of environmental conditions on the ground surface settlement, it has been found that the risk factors of grouting pressure behind the segment, the ratio of tunnel depth to groundwater level, and drained cohesion strength at a significant level of 5% have a direct effect on the probability of settlement. The results also showed that the effect of grout injection pressure on ground subsidence is more than other parameters, and with increasing injection pressure, the probability of exceeding safe subsidence values decreases. In addition, it has been found that increasing the risk factor for the ratio of tunnel depth to groundwater level reduces the probability of exceeding the safe ground settlement. Finally, increasing the number of risk factors for drained cohesion strength increases the probability of exceeding safe settlement.
