Mineral Processing
Chol Ung Ryom; Kwang Hyok Pak; Il Chol Sin; Kwang Chol So
Abstract
Shaking table and flotation are often used in scheelite (CaWO4) beneficiation, and usually they are applied in sequence. In this paper, analysis of mineral movement have been investigated in shaking table in which pulp was conditioned with xanthate as a collector and fed, heavy scheelite was concentrated, ...
Read More
Shaking table and flotation are often used in scheelite (CaWO4) beneficiation, and usually they are applied in sequence. In this paper, analysis of mineral movement have been investigated in shaking table in which pulp was conditioned with xanthate as a collector and fed, heavy scheelite was concentrated, while heavy pyrite removed directly on the deck by the action of collector. Artificially mixed mineral with 1% scheelite and 2% pyrite was used in CFD simulations and experiments. Through CFD simulations, it was found that pyrite particles, which were hydrophobic by collector, were attached to the water-air interface and subjected to upward buoyancy, which increased the density difference between scheelite and pyrite particles and enabled the separation of both minerals in the shaking table. The experiment results showed that the concentrate grade in conventional table concentration was 23.5% WO3, the separation efficiency was 77.89%, while the concentrate grade of scheelite in the table concentration of xanthate presence was 65.0% WO3 and the separation efficiency was 80.88%. The combination of flotation in table with collector addition not only eliminated the flotation to remove pyrite after table but also resulted in a lower rate of scheelite loss.
Mineral Processing
Chol Ung Ryom; Kwang Hyok Pak; Il Chol Sin; Kwang Chol So; Un Chol Han
Abstract
Scheelite ore with heavy and magnetic minerals can be generally concentrated using shaking table centered gravity-magnetic processing. When magnetic field is formed by fixing magnetic bars on which permanent magnets are arranged at a constant interval, above the table desk, heavy scheelite particles ...
Read More
Scheelite ore with heavy and magnetic minerals can be generally concentrated using shaking table centered gravity-magnetic processing. When magnetic field is formed by fixing magnetic bars on which permanent magnets are arranged at a constant interval, above the table desk, heavy scheelite particles can be concentrated by gravity, whereas heavy magnetic mineral particles can be floated off like light mineral particles by upward magnetic force. In this paper, concentration of scheelite and removal of pyrrhotite floated by magnetic force was simulated using CFD for the sample containing 1% scheelite and 2% pyrrhotite, and compared with the experiment. As a result, WO3 grade and separation efficiency of concentrate were 65.3% and 80.1%, respectively, in the new table equipped with magnetic bars, whereas 28.4% and 76.5%, respectively, in conventional table. The magnetic field formed by fixing magnetic bars above table could be significant in simplifying the sequential tabling-magnetic separation process and reducing the loss of scheelite.
Mineral Processing
N. Khorasanizadeh; M. Karamoozian; H. Nouri-Bidgoli
Abstract
The bubble diameter effect on the bubble rise velocity profile in a flotation column is studied by the two-phase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. The simulations are done in the ANSYS® Fluent® software using a two-phase volume of fluid model. The computational domain is a square cross-section ...
Read More
The bubble diameter effect on the bubble rise velocity profile in a flotation column is studied by the two-phase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. The simulations are done in the ANSYS® Fluent® software using a two-phase volume of fluid model. The computational domain is a square cross-section column with a 10 cm width and a 100 cm height, in which air is interred as a single bubble from the lower part of the column by an internal sparger. An experimental test is also performed, the hydrodynamics parameters are recorded, and the simulated results are validated using the values obtained for the bubble rise velocity. The simulation results obtained indicate that CFD can predict the bubble rise velocity profile and its value in the flotation column with less than 5% difference in comparison with the experimental results. Then the simulations are repeated for the other initial bubble diameter in the bubbly flow regime in order to study the bubble diameter effect on the rise velocity profile. The results obtained demonstrate that the larger bubbles reach the maximum velocity faster than the small ones, while the value of maximum velocity decreases by an increase in the bubble diameter. These results can be used to improve the flotation efficiency.
R. Morla; Sh. Karekal; A. Godbole
Abstract
Diesel-operated Load Haul Dumper (LHD) vehicles are commonly used in underground coal mines. Despite their value as utility vehicles, the main drawback of these vehicles is that they generate diesel particulate matter (DPM), a known carcinogenic agent. In this work, an attempt is made to model DPM flows ...
Read More
Diesel-operated Load Haul Dumper (LHD) vehicles are commonly used in underground coal mines. Despite their value as utility vehicles, the main drawback of these vehicles is that they generate diesel particulate matter (DPM), a known carcinogenic agent. In this work, an attempt is made to model DPM flows generated by LHDs in an underground coal mine environment for different DPM flow and intake air flow directions. The field experiments are conducted and used to validate the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models and used to map the DPM flow patterns. The results obtained show that if DPM and the intake air co-flow (flow in the same direction), DPM is confined predominantly in the middle of the roadway. To the contrary, if the DPM and intake air counter-flow (flow in the opposite directions), the DPM spread occurs throughout the entire cross-section of the roadway. In the latter case, the operator will be more susceptible to exposure to high concentrations of DPM. Overall, the DPM concentration decreases with an increase in the intake air velocities. For co-flow for intake air velocities of 2 m/s, 3 m/s, and 4 m/s, the DPM concentrations at 50 m downstream of the vehicles are 39 µg/m3, 23 µg/m3, and 19 µg/ m3, respectively. The DPM concentration is also influenced by the DPM temperature at the source. For the DPM temperatures of 30 oC, 40 oC, 50 oC, and 60 oC, the DPM concentrations at 50 m downstream of the source are 43 µg/m3, 34 µg/m3, 12 µg/m3, and 9 µg/m3, respectively.
